2016 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/eem.2016.7521190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-convexities in European day-ahead electricity markets: Belgium as a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach to address these problems has been the introduction of so-called block orders [10], which connect multiple bids submitted for various periods and they must be fully accepted or rejected in all of the respective periods (in other words, they are characterized by the 'fill-or-kill' condition). These bids imply non-convexities (integer variables) in the market clearing problem [11], making the efficient clearing of large scale markets challenging [12]. To guarantee the existence of MCP when block orders are allowed, we must allow their deactivation, regardless of their bid prices [13].…”
Section: Complex Orders In Electricity Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first approach to address these problems has been the introduction of so-called block orders [10], which connect multiple bids submitted for various periods and they must be fully accepted or rejected in all of the respective periods (in other words, they are characterized by the 'fill-or-kill' condition). These bids imply non-convexities (integer variables) in the market clearing problem [11], making the efficient clearing of large scale markets challenging [12]. To guarantee the existence of MCP when block orders are allowed, we must allow their deactivation, regardless of their bid prices [13].…”
Section: Complex Orders In Electricity Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee the existence of MCP when block orders are allowed, we must allow their deactivation, regardless of their bid prices [13]. This may result in so-called paradoxically rejected block orders [14], the rejection of which seemingly contradicts to the resulting market clearing prices (but in fact, they can not be accepted without the violation of other constraints, since if they get accepted the MCP will not exist anymore [11]).…”
Section: Complex Orders In Electricity Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can use any subset of them for our purpose. In particular, the complementary slackness associated to the constraints (19)- (20) are defined as follows:…”
Section: The Final Milp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [13] presents the problems that appeared in the pan-European day-ahead market which includes non-convex products (block orders) and uses a uniform pricing scheme for the P a g e 31 | 162 settlement process, as currently applied. Ten instances (days) corresponding to the Belgian market are examined where the total execution time and the social welfare are compared using a uniform and a non-uniform pricing scheme.…”
Section: Flow Based Market Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, currently there is no research work concerning the solution of the European dayahead electricity markets considering a nodal network representation and an AC instead of the DC transmission network representation which is currently used by models in the literature [10], [12]- [13], [14]- [17], [21], [25]- [26], [67]- [69]. In this thesis a distributed-slack bus model using AC linearized constraints is presented in order to incorporate the losses and the effect of voltages and reactive power in the clearing results, through loss sensitivities and distribution factors.…”
Section: Thesis Motivation and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%