Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.4156/jcit.vol6.issue5.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-convergence Criterion on Slope Stability FE Analysis by Strength Reduction Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dawson and Roth (1999) defined the slope failure as the time, when the ratio of unbalanced force to applied load is in excess of 0.1%. Nian et al (2011) indicated that slope deformation and instability to failure process could be analysed by using the strength reduction method.…”
Section: Slope Failure Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dawson and Roth (1999) defined the slope failure as the time, when the ratio of unbalanced force to applied load is in excess of 0.1%. Nian et al (2011) indicated that slope deformation and instability to failure process could be analysed by using the strength reduction method.…”
Section: Slope Failure Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cases of geometry of the slope, the slope angle or degree was inversely proportional to the FOS of the slope. As follows, the greater the slope degree , the smaller the FOS then the slope is more likely to be failure (Nian et al 2011).…”
Section: Geometry Of Slopementioning
confidence: 96%