2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-continuous measurement of intraocular pressure in laboratory animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preclinical assessment of drugs aimed at lowering IOP has been traditionally performed on monkeys with artificially increased IOP (Wang et al, 2000), but such experiments are prohibitively expensive and currently rarely conducted due to ethical reasons. Instead, following the development of non-invasive technologies of IOP measurement applicable to small animals, IOP-dependent rodent models have become popular, in which OH is artificially induced (Millar and Pang, 2015;Biswas and Wan, 2019). Although these models reproduce certain aspects of human glaucoma, since retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss does not develop naturally, an increase in IOP is usually abrupt and may not be long-lasting, and inflammatory components due to physical injury may be a confounding factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preclinical assessment of drugs aimed at lowering IOP has been traditionally performed on monkeys with artificially increased IOP (Wang et al, 2000), but such experiments are prohibitively expensive and currently rarely conducted due to ethical reasons. Instead, following the development of non-invasive technologies of IOP measurement applicable to small animals, IOP-dependent rodent models have become popular, in which OH is artificially induced (Millar and Pang, 2015;Biswas and Wan, 2019). Although these models reproduce certain aspects of human glaucoma, since retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss does not develop naturally, an increase in IOP is usually abrupt and may not be long-lasting, and inflammatory components due to physical injury may be a confounding factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Many reports have confirmed the accuracy of tonometry readings through simultaneous validation with direct cannulation methods, which have been traditionally accepted as the most accurate method of measuring IOP. [6][7][8] Unlike tonometry, direct cannulation studies require the use of an anesthetic agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabbits were treated with care and were maintained calm for at least 3 min before IOP measurement. In the case of any sign of stress, IOP measurements were postponed for at least another 3 min [20,21]. For each eye, IOP was set at 100% with two basal readings taken 30 min before and immediately before the instillation of the formulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%