2015
DOI: 10.1111/oik.02196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐consumptive effects of a top‐predator decrease the strength of the trophic cascade in a four‐level terrestrial food web

Abstract: The fear of predators can strongly impact food web dynamics and ecosystem functioning through effects on herbivores morphology, physiology or behaviour. While non‐consumptive predator effects have been mostly studied in three‐level food chains, we lack evidence for the propagation of non‐consumptive indirect effects of apex predators in four level food‐webs, notably in terrestrial ecosystems. In experimental mesocosms, we manipulated a four‐level food chain including top‐predator cues (snakes), mesopredators (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each year, populations were composed of 11 ± 1 adult females, 6 ± 1 adult males, 9 ± 2 yearlings and 38 ± 4 juveniles. These population densities conform with local densities observed in natural populations [ 37 , 79 ] and in other seminatural experiments on common lizards [ 68 , 71 , 77 , 80 82 ]. There was no difference between treatments in juvenile birthdate, in individual snout–vent length, or mass at release ( p > 0.36 for all).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Each year, populations were composed of 11 ± 1 adult females, 6 ± 1 adult males, 9 ± 2 yearlings and 38 ± 4 juveniles. These population densities conform with local densities observed in natural populations [ 37 , 79 ] and in other seminatural experiments on common lizards [ 68 , 71 , 77 , 80 82 ]. There was no difference between treatments in juvenile birthdate, in individual snout–vent length, or mass at release ( p > 0.36 for all).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This design allowed controlling for a family effect as siblings are not independent in terms of dispersal. Each population included 7 AE 1 adult males, 12 AE 1 adult females, 7 AE 2 yearlings and 35 AE 3 juveniles, conforming with local densities in natural populations (Massot et al 1992;Bestion et al 2015). There were no differences between treatments in juvenile birthdate, snoutvent length, mass and preferred temperature at release (P > 0.7 for all).…”
Section: Release and Dispersal Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…; Bestion et al . ). There were no differences between treatments in juvenile birthdate, snout‐vent length, mass and preferred temperature at release ( P > 0.7 for all).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it appears that all ecological parameters are more strongly influenced by genetic background, directly or environmentally-mediated, than by the sole effect of developmental thermal conditions. In aquatic ecosystems, predators often have strong top-down impacts by directly controlling prey species and indirectly primary production and nutrient cycling (Bestion, Cucherousset, Teyssier, & Cote, 2015;Shurin et al, 2002). This may explain why (heritable) trait variation in predators such as C. erythrea has substantial consequences on several ecosystem parameters (see also El-Sabaawi et al, 2015;Harmon et al, 2009;Raffard et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%