1984
DOI: 10.4099/math1924.10.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-complete algebraic surfaces with logarithmic Kodaira dimension - ∞ and with non-connected boundaries at infinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let h : Σ → Σ be the minimal resolution of the singularity O. Then the exceptional locus h −1 (O) is an admissible rational fork F = B 0 + T 1 + T 2 + T 3 (see [6] for the definitions), where B 0 is the central component and T 1 , T 2 , T 3 are three maximal rational twigs meeting B 0 . The A 1 * -fibration π : X → B extends to an A 1 -fibration π : Σ → B for which B 0 is a cross-section.…”
Section: A 1 * -Fibrations Given By G M -Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let h : Σ → Σ be the minimal resolution of the singularity O. Then the exceptional locus h −1 (O) is an admissible rational fork F = B 0 + T 1 + T 2 + T 3 (see [6] for the definitions), where B 0 is the central component and T 1 , T 2 , T 3 are three maximal rational twigs meeting B 0 . The A 1 * -fibration π : X → B extends to an A 1 -fibration π : Σ → B for which B 0 is a cross-section.…”
Section: A 1 * -Fibrations Given By G M -Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans ce paragraphe onénoncera quelques conséquences du théorème principal, du théorème 7.1, et de la classification des surfaces quasi-projectives de dimension logarithmique de Kodaira −∞ (voir [13], [14]) sur la structure des surfaces Kählériènnes complètes, non compactes, de courbure de Ricci positive vérifiant la condition "C", ( les notations sont celles du paragraphe précédent). Donnons d'abord les deux définitions suivantes Définition 1.…”
Section: Conséquences Du Théorème Principalunclassified
“…The above Theorem (2.3) can be reduced to the following Theorem (1.1) by taking a partial resolution of S. The crucial results used in the proof of Theorem (1.1) are those in [8,9] on affine-ruledness of open surfaces and in [11] or [12] on fundamental groups of some open rational surfaces. Here, if there are nodes in f ∆ + D * , we replace f by the composition of the minimal resolution of S and the blowing-up of nodes.…”
Section: Theorem (23) Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we apply the log minimal model programme in [5] for the pair (X o , B o ). Since K Xo + B o is not nef, by the cone theorem [5], there are an extremal ray and a corresponding contraction σ 1 : [4] or [6], we see easily, in the notation of [8]…”
Section: Lemma (13) Let (S ∆) Be As In Theorem (11) With the Abomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation