2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0710-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-compensability in Composite Indicators: A Robust Directional Frontier Method

Abstract: This paper follows the research mainstream aimed to link the efficiency frontier approaches and the composite indicators (CI) methods. More in detail, the main drawbacks of the CI methods based on Benefit of the Doubt (BoD) approach are the sensitivity to the outliers, the perfect compensability and the lack of consideration about the marginal rate of substitution between simple indicators. Following Simar and Vanhems (J Econ 166(2):342–354, 2012) results, we propose a weighting method that bypassing all previ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This robust composite index score is constructed using the aforementioned mix of desirable and undesirable performance indicators using a robust order-m version of the directional distance function model as discussed by (Zanella et al, 2015;Rogge et al, 2017). This version of the composite score is robust in the sense that it corrects for the (potential) presence of municipalities with outlying and/or extreme performance data values (see also Vidoli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Choice Of the Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This robust composite index score is constructed using the aforementioned mix of desirable and undesirable performance indicators using a robust order-m version of the directional distance function model as discussed by (Zanella et al, 2015;Rogge et al, 2017). This version of the composite score is robust in the sense that it corrects for the (potential) presence of municipalities with outlying and/or extreme performance data values (see also Vidoli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Choice Of the Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 In a recent proposal, Vidoli et al ( 2015 ) suggest the use of a directional distance function to introduce reasonable weight constrains. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust Benefit of Doubt RBoD Procedure based on Vidoli et al [107]. Estimated using ci_rbod command in Compind R package [107] with M = 20, B = 20.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis and Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated using ci_rbod command in Compind R package [107] with M = 20, B = 20. Applied to the same 4 PC extracted from PCA.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis and Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%