1986
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/s2-33.1.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Commutative Unique Factorisation Rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The one obvious exception is localisability, and there is no hope of proving this because we did not know enough about the ring R/pR. We will show in Section 4 that pR is localisable if R satisfies a polynomial identity, and the Noetherian case was dealt with in the proof of Theorem 2.1 of [6].…”
Section: General Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The one obvious exception is localisability, and there is no hope of proving this because we did not know enough about the ring R/pR. We will show in Section 4 that pR is localisable if R satisfies a polynomial identity, and the Noetherian case was dealt with in the proof of Theorem 2.1 of [6].…”
Section: General Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(unique factorisation domain) if R is an integral domain and every non-zero prime ideal contains a completely prime element. These definitions were introduced for Noetherian rings in [5] and [6]. We shall repeatedly use the fact that if x is a normal element of R and P is a prime ideal of R, then either x e P or xeC(P); this is because (xR + P)/P=(Rx + P)/P is a twosided ideal of the prime ring R/P, and an ideal of a prime ring is either 0 or its left and right annihilators are 0.…”
Section: Definitions Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recall from [7] that a noetherian domain R is called a unique factorization domain (UFD) if every non-zero prime ideal of R contains a non-zero completely prime ideal of the form pR where p is normal in R. The following is immediate from Theorem 3.13.…”
Section: Proof (I)mentioning
confidence: 91%