Objectives:Resin infiltration is an innovative approach for enhancing the esthetic appearance of white spot lesions (WSLs). The aim of this study was to compare the effect of both resin infiltrant (ICON) and adhesive resin with respect to esthetic improvement.
Methods:A randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial was conducted on 10 young adults with at least two non-cavitated white spot lesions in esthetic zones. They were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: resin infiltrant (Icon, pre-product: DMG) or Adper TM single bond 2 adhesive system (3M ESPG dental product, USA) application after 15% hydrochloric acid (HCL) etching and dehydration with ethanol. Vita Easyshade V (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany) spectrophotometer was used to measure the CIELAB coordinates and values were used to calculate difference in color (ΔE). Data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using computer software SPSS.Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in both (ΔL) and (Δa) with increase in (Δb) with ICON application (p<0.05). Regarding adhesive resin, there was a significant decrease in both (ΔL) and (Δa) coordinates with non-significant change in (Δb). Also, there was a statistically significant difference between ICON and adhesive resin regarding (ΔE).
Conclusions:Color change of white spot lesion treated with ICON and adhesive resin was clinically obvious after treatment with hydrochloric acid. However, ICON reported significant results in esthetic improvement in all color parameters.
(3576)Rania Mosallam, et al.