2011
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-canonical HIF-2α function drives autonomous breast cancer cell growth via an AREG–EGFR/ErbB4 autocrine loop

Abstract: Tumor progression is intrinsically tied to the clonal selection of tumor cells with acquired phenotypes allowing to cope with a hostile microenvironment. Hypoxiainducible factors (HIFs) master the transcriptional response to local tissue hypoxia, a hallmark of solid tumors. Here, we report significantly longer patient survival in breast cancer with high levels of HIF-2a. Amphiregulin (AREG) and WNT1-inducible signaling pathway protein-2 (WISP2) expression was strongly HIF2a-dependent and their promoters were p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
97
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(61 reference statements)
14
97
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, HIF1A expression showed progressive induction in breast tumors from grade 1 to grade 3, and HIF2A (EPAS1) expression showed the opposite (Fig. 1B); this result is consistent with the antagonistic relationship between HIF1-α and HIF2-α reported previously in breast cancer (34). These observations indicate that the differential regulation of Ezh2 and PRC2 function in different subtypes of breast cancer might be associated with HIF1-α and that the up-regulation of Ezh2 in TNBC may implicate a PRC2-independent function, supporting previously reported non-PRC2 activity of Ezh2 in TNBC (8,13).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, HIF1A expression showed progressive induction in breast tumors from grade 1 to grade 3, and HIF2A (EPAS1) expression showed the opposite (Fig. 1B); this result is consistent with the antagonistic relationship between HIF1-α and HIF2-α reported previously in breast cancer (34). These observations indicate that the differential regulation of Ezh2 and PRC2 function in different subtypes of breast cancer might be associated with HIF1-α and that the up-regulation of Ezh2 in TNBC may implicate a PRC2-independent function, supporting previously reported non-PRC2 activity of Ezh2 in TNBC (8,13).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Stable knockdown of HIF-1 α and HIF-2 α in HEK293 cells by RNA interference was achieved by lentiviral transduction of short hairpin (shRNA) constructs. Viral particles were produced in HEK293T human enbryonic kidney cells using the ViraPower lentiviral expression system according to the manufacturer ' s protocol (Invitrogen, Basel, Switzerland) as described previously (Stiehl et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cell Culture and Lentiviral Transductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have proposed that while HIF-1 controls the acute or immediate response to hypoxia during tumor development, HIF-2 may be responsible for the prolonged hypoxic response [26]. Furthermore, there is evidence indicating the role that HIF-1 or HIF-2 plays within tumors depends on their opposing regulation of MYC transcriptional activity [94].…”
Section: Hifs Role In Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although HIF-1α was previously hypothesized to be the predominant regulator of the hypoxic response in breast cancer cells [1, 22,26], emerging evidence also indicates that HIF-2α may also play a role in breast cancer growth, as will be further discussed in Chapter 4. Recent studies have proposed that while HIF-1 controls the acute or immediate response to hypoxia during tumor development, HIF-2 may be responsible for the prolonged hypoxic response [26].…”
Section: Hifs Role In Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation