1994
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Candida fungal infections after bone marrow transplantation: Risk factors and outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
115
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
115
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, although the incidence of fungal infections in this study did not allow us to define statistically significant risk factors, our results support a delayed onset, with invasive aspergillosis occurring mainly after resolution of the neutropenic period, different from that reported after standard allo-SCT. [41][42][43][44] In standard allo-SCT, the transplant period is classically divided into three phases. The first phase is related to the aplastic period, with neutropenia and toxicity of the conditioning regimen favoring a majority of bacterial infections, but also favoring fungal infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, although the incidence of fungal infections in this study did not allow us to define statistically significant risk factors, our results support a delayed onset, with invasive aspergillosis occurring mainly after resolution of the neutropenic period, different from that reported after standard allo-SCT. [41][42][43][44] In standard allo-SCT, the transplant period is classically divided into three phases. The first phase is related to the aplastic period, with neutropenia and toxicity of the conditioning regimen favoring a majority of bacterial infections, but also favoring fungal infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first phase is related to the aplastic period, with neutropenia and toxicity of the conditioning regimen favoring a majority of bacterial infections, but also favoring fungal infections. 36,[41][42][43][44] The second phase is characterized by neutrophil recovery, but a major T-cell dysfunction due to the immunosuppressive therapies used for acute GVHD management and thus favoring viral infections, especially CMV. 13,34 A third phase might develop in some long-term surviving patients with several complex immune dysfunctions due to chronic GVHD and/or prolonged immunosuppression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] It is the most common etiology of non-Candida fungal infections occurring in these patients, and the case-fatality rate for invasive aspergillosis exceeds 80%. Although prolonged neutropenia is a well-established risk factor for Aspergillus infections, the majority of infections in the allogeneic setting become clinically evident well after engraftment, 2 suggesting that cell-mediated immunity plays an important role in protec-tion against this pathogen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Recent reports suggest that the majority of these infections are caused by Aspergillus sp., [1][2][3][4] but invasive Candida infections are also common in allogeneic SCT recipients. [5][6][7] Fluconazole prophylaxis has been widely used in SCT patients due to the results of randomised trials suggesting efficacy.…”
Section: Tion; Treatment Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%