2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19632.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-ballistic superluminal motion in the plane of the sky - II.

Abstract: The model of non-ballistic jet motion Gong (2008) provides a simple explanation for inward jet motion and bent jets. Recently, evidence for such non-radial motion has accumulated rapidly, and more complicated morphologies have appeared. However, the ballistic plus precession model is likely to hold in most samples of jet motion. In this paper, we discuss the relationship between the ballistic and non-ballistic models of jet motion. This relationship suggests that the interaction of ejectors with ambient matter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional mechanism or effect must be introduced to produce a wide jet. The precession of the jet axis, or the assumption that the components follow non-ballistic and non-linear paths, can lead to such jet properties (e.g., Steffen et al 1995;Gong 2008;Roland et al 2008;Gong et al 2011). In these models, jet components follow highly curved trajectories, which, viewed face-on, would give the impression of a wider distribution of jet component position angles.…”
Section: Possible Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional mechanism or effect must be introduced to produce a wide jet. The precession of the jet axis, or the assumption that the components follow non-ballistic and non-linear paths, can lead to such jet properties (e.g., Steffen et al 1995;Gong 2008;Roland et al 2008;Gong et al 2011). In these models, jet components follow highly curved trajectories, which, viewed face-on, would give the impression of a wider distribution of jet component position angles.…”
Section: Possible Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A precession of the jet nozzle can be due to e.g., double super-massive black holes or other reasons (see Britzen et al 2010a and references therein). For the non-ballistic jet, models have been proposed e.g., Gong et al (2011), also see Lister et al (2009b) and Britzen et al (2009Britzen et al ( , 2010aBritzen et al ( , 2010b for discussions. In these models, a non-ballistic motion of jet is largely related to the jet interaction with ambient matter.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consisting with the sub-luminal motion or the 'stationary scenario' of 0716+714, as proposed by Britzen et al (2009). In general, a non-ballistic jet is likely to be formed, through the shocked jet plasma working on the surrounding medium (Gong et al 2011), and a helical like trajectory of the jet ridge-line would be expected.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional mechanism or effect must be introduced to produce a wide jet. Precession of the jet axis, or assuming that the components follow non-ballistic and non-linear paths, can lead to such jet properties (e.g., Steffen et al 1995b;Gong 2008;Roland et al 2008;Gong et al 2011). In these models, jet components follow highly curved trajectories, which, viewed face-on, would give the impression of a wider distribution of jet component position angles.…”
Section: Possible Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%