2012
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-B DB v2.0: a database of predicted non-B DNA-forming motifs and its associated tools

Abstract: The non-B DB, available at http://nonb.abcc.ncifcrf.gov, catalogs predicted non-B DNA-forming sequence motifs, including Z-DNA, G-quadruplex, A-phased repeats, inverted repeats, mirror repeats, direct repeats and their corresponding subsets: cruciforms, triplexes and slipped structures, in several genomes. Version 2.0 of the database revises and re-implements the motif discovery algorithms to better align with accepted definitions and thresholds for motifs, expands the non-B DNA-forming motifs coverage by incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
130
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
3
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were able to sequence rare telomere-genomic fusions from LIG3 −/− :LIG4 −/− cells, reinforcing the notion of the coincidence of fusion foci with DNA replication, since LIG1 is the most rational protagonist mediating these LIG4-independent inter-chromosomal events (Arakawa et al 2012;Lu et al 2016). Further support arises from our finding of a conspicuous and significant association of LIG3 −/− :LIG4 −/− junctionproximal sequence with non-B DNA structures (Cooper et al 2011;Cer et al 2013) and a trend toward increased coincidence with fragile sites for LIG4 −/− junctions, implicating replication fork-stalling (Vissers et al 2009;Minca and Kowalski 2011;Ozeri-Galai et al 2011;Mizuno et al 2013) as a determinant of chromosome breakage and/or fusion. The A-NHEJ DNA polymerase theta also functions at the earliest stages of DNA replication and may, therefore, play a role in the introduction of the residual templated insertions resolved in these LIG4-deficient cells (Fernandez-Vidal et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were able to sequence rare telomere-genomic fusions from LIG3 −/− :LIG4 −/− cells, reinforcing the notion of the coincidence of fusion foci with DNA replication, since LIG1 is the most rational protagonist mediating these LIG4-independent inter-chromosomal events (Arakawa et al 2012;Lu et al 2016). Further support arises from our finding of a conspicuous and significant association of LIG3 −/− :LIG4 −/− junctionproximal sequence with non-B DNA structures (Cooper et al 2011;Cer et al 2013) and a trend toward increased coincidence with fragile sites for LIG4 −/− junctions, implicating replication fork-stalling (Vissers et al 2009;Minca and Kowalski 2011;Ozeri-Galai et al 2011;Mizuno et al 2013) as a determinant of chromosome breakage and/or fusion. The A-NHEJ DNA polymerase theta also functions at the earliest stages of DNA replication and may, therefore, play a role in the introduction of the residual templated insertions resolved in these LIG4-deficient cells (Fernandez-Vidal et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…4B,C), indicating that repetitive DNA content alone does not confer a predisposition for the ultimate fusion ligation. We next investigated junction-proximal sequence context and discovered a unique and significant enhancement (sixfold over WT; P ≤ 0.001) in the incidence of non-B DNA structures (Cer et al 2013) within 500 bp of LIG3 −/− :LIG4 −/− inter-chromosomal fusion junctions (Supplemental Fig. 4D).…”
Section: A-and C-nhej Of Dysfunctional Human Telomeresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Non-B DNA (combined length of each class in base pairs). The Non-B DB v2.0 annotation was used in this analysis (Cer et al 2013). The classes of non-B DNA used were: A phased repeat, direct repeat, G-quadruplex motif, inverted repeat, mirror repeat, short tandem repeat, and Z DNA motif.…”
Section: Correlation Between Elongation Rate and Gene Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To clarify whether the breakpoints were associated with repeat sequences or known rearrangement-inducing DNA features, we analyzed a 150-bp region on either side of the breakpoints using Repeatmasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org), palindrome (http:// emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/palindrome), and non-B database (https://nonb-abcc.ncifcrf.gov/). The non-B motifs analyzed were A-phased repeats, direct repeats, G-quadruplex motifs, inverted repeats, mirror repeats, short tandem repeats, and Z-DNA motifs [Cer et al, 2013].…”
Section: Molecular Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%