1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-52229-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Archimedean Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
486
0
24

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 643 publications
(514 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
486
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Let K be either C p or a complete discretely valued subfield of C p and | | be the absolute value on K such that |p| = p −1 (or more generally we may suppose that K is a complete stable valued field (see [BGR,§3.6.1, Def. 1])).…”
Section: Rigid Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let K be either C p or a complete discretely valued subfield of C p and | | be the absolute value on K such that |p| = p −1 (or more generally we may suppose that K is a complete stable valued field (see [BGR,§3.6.1, Def. 1])).…”
Section: Rigid Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N v/ give distinct restrictions to L and therefore independent. By using a similar argument to that in [6], namely Proposition 1, page 141 from [8], it follows that the completion of L with respect to w (that is a subring of R) is not an integral domain.…”
Section: Background Materialsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(1) G is affine and smooth over S; (2) for all s ∈ S, thes-algebraic group Gs := G × Ss is connected and reductive (resp. connected and semi-simple).…”
Section: Is a Maximal Bounded Subgroup Of G(k)mentioning
confidence: 99%