“… b Onoue et al (). Non‐animal photosafety assessment approaches for cosmetics based on the photochemical and photobiochemical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 19 chemicals were judged in a similar result between the two methods. We prepared the nonanimal photosafety assessment approach, with reference to the report by Onoue et al () and showed it in Figure . A test chemical was first evaluated for its UV absorption at 290‐700 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the 60 test chemicals, their respective CAS numbers, suppliers and the solvents used to prepare their test chemical solutions are summarized in Table . These chemicals have varying photoallergy potential and were selected from the report by Onoue (Drucker & Rosen, ; Onoue et al, , ). In addition, five nonphotoallergens, erythromycin, phenytoin, isopropyl myristate, lauric acid and propylene glycol, were selected from these 60 test chemicals for the assessment of mixtures.…”
Photoallergy test of cosmetics and several types of pharmaceutical substances is often necessary for obtaining approval from authorities. However, there are no official test guidelines for photoallergy evaluation. Therefore, we tried to establish a photoallergy test by utilizing an in chemico alternative sensitization method, amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA). To determine the criteria for judging the photoallergy potential, photo-ADRA with or without photoirradiation was performed using 60 photoallergenic chemicals, and cysteine and lysine derivatives were detected using high-performance liquid chromatography either by absorbance or fluorescence measurement. The accuracy of prediction was 81.4% (48 of 59) and 80.0% (48 of 60) using the absorbance and fluorescence methods, respectively. However, as chemicals can breakdown into multiple chemicals during photoirradiation, the absorbance method often cannot perform accurate detection due to co-elution, whereas the fluorescence method can do this due to lack of co-elution. Moreover, all eight chemicals that were found to be negative or false-positive for photoirritation in the 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity test were confirmed as positive for photoallergy using this method. Furthermore, we prepared three types of pseudo-mixtures where we added one photoallergen along with five nonphotoallergens and performed the photo-ADRA by the ultraviolet and fluorescence methods. The result of the fluorescence method was almost the same as that obtained with the use of a single photoallergen and hence the outcome was not affected by the mixture. Thus, this study not only showed a method of evaluating the photoallergy potential of a single chemical but also a mixture, making it useful as an in chemico photoallergy alternative test.
“… b Onoue et al (). Non‐animal photosafety assessment approaches for cosmetics based on the photochemical and photobiochemical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 19 chemicals were judged in a similar result between the two methods. We prepared the nonanimal photosafety assessment approach, with reference to the report by Onoue et al () and showed it in Figure . A test chemical was first evaluated for its UV absorption at 290‐700 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the 60 test chemicals, their respective CAS numbers, suppliers and the solvents used to prepare their test chemical solutions are summarized in Table . These chemicals have varying photoallergy potential and were selected from the report by Onoue (Drucker & Rosen, ; Onoue et al, , ). In addition, five nonphotoallergens, erythromycin, phenytoin, isopropyl myristate, lauric acid and propylene glycol, were selected from these 60 test chemicals for the assessment of mixtures.…”
Photoallergy test of cosmetics and several types of pharmaceutical substances is often necessary for obtaining approval from authorities. However, there are no official test guidelines for photoallergy evaluation. Therefore, we tried to establish a photoallergy test by utilizing an in chemico alternative sensitization method, amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA). To determine the criteria for judging the photoallergy potential, photo-ADRA with or without photoirradiation was performed using 60 photoallergenic chemicals, and cysteine and lysine derivatives were detected using high-performance liquid chromatography either by absorbance or fluorescence measurement. The accuracy of prediction was 81.4% (48 of 59) and 80.0% (48 of 60) using the absorbance and fluorescence methods, respectively. However, as chemicals can breakdown into multiple chemicals during photoirradiation, the absorbance method often cannot perform accurate detection due to co-elution, whereas the fluorescence method can do this due to lack of co-elution. Moreover, all eight chemicals that were found to be negative or false-positive for photoirritation in the 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity test were confirmed as positive for photoallergy using this method. Furthermore, we prepared three types of pseudo-mixtures where we added one photoallergen along with five nonphotoallergens and performed the photo-ADRA by the ultraviolet and fluorescence methods. The result of the fluorescence method was almost the same as that obtained with the use of a single photoallergen and hence the outcome was not affected by the mixture. Thus, this study not only showed a method of evaluating the photoallergy potential of a single chemical but also a mixture, making it useful as an in chemico photoallergy alternative test.
“…Similarly, the interaction of topical pharmaceutical products with cosmetics is outside the scope of this paper. Once again, there is a significant body of literature concerned with the formulation of cosmetics . Given the similarity of many cosmetic formulation types with those used for pharmaceuticals, there is a considerable degree of overlap in the formulation concepts employed and a potential risk of destabilizing the formulation of either or both agents.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once again, there is a significant body of literature concerned with the formulation of cosmetics. 23,24 Given the similarity of many cosmetic formulation types with those used for pharmaceuticals, there is a considerable degree of overlap in the formulation concepts employed and a potential risk of destabilizing the formulation of either or both agents. Many cosmetic products deliberately contain colored materials with potentially complex photochemical behavior that may have the potential to initiate instability in an otherwise stable pharmaceutical product.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.