2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2012.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-alignment in footing, intentionality and dissent in talk about immigrants in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reinforced other speakers’ discourse, avoided voicing an opinion that departed from the perceived norm, and reduced accountability for discourse. Pagliai (2012) suggested that a function of non-alignment in footing was to conceal disagreement with other speakers. However, the strategy, in this case, may have also served to conceal agreement with a statement creating discordance between actual and desired self-image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reinforced other speakers’ discourse, avoided voicing an opinion that departed from the perceived norm, and reduced accountability for discourse. Pagliai (2012) suggested that a function of non-alignment in footing was to conceal disagreement with other speakers. However, the strategy, in this case, may have also served to conceal agreement with a statement creating discordance between actual and desired self-image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These implications compound into more enduring ideologies. Continual engagements and reception to memeflags create a lasting framework through which users align themselves (see Agha, 2005; Pagliai, 2012). The continued understanding of “what memeflags do” offers a light identity marker through which users may interact.…”
Section: Example 1: To Catch a Shitpostermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, work over the past year has looked at direct strategies for intervening in discourses that reproduce racism. In her close analysis of talk about immigrants in Italy, Valentina Pagliai () examines how speakers establish footings of nonalignment to disengage from racializing discourses. At a wider scale, the Language and Social Justice Committee of the Society for Linguistic Anthropology has been actively engaged in disrupting a racializing discourse in the United States in which undocumented immigrants are labeled “illegal.” In spring of 2013, the “Drop the I‐Word” campaign (Rosa ) was successful in convincing the Associated Press and other media outlets to terminate the use of illegal when characterizing the authorization status of migrants.…”
Section: Diversity: Super and Regularmentioning
confidence: 99%