Non-adherence to antimicrobial treatment guidelines results in more broad-spectrum but not more appropriate therapy

Abstract

Mortality in patients admitted with sepsis is high and the increasing incidence of infections with multiresistant bacteria is a worldwide problem. Many hospitals have local antimicrobial guidelines to assure effective treatment and limit the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, thereby reducing the selection of resistant bacteria. We evaluated adherence to the antimicrobial treatment guidelines of our hospital in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis and assessed the in vitro susceptibility of isolated pathogens to the guideline-recommended treatment and the prescribed treatment. We included all adult patients with a known or suspected infection and two or more extended systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Patients who did not receive antimicrobial treatment, presented with infections not included in the guidelines, or had more than one possible focus of infection were excluded. A total of 276 ED visits (262 patients) were included. Guideline-concordant treatment was prescribed in 168 visits (61%). In the case of guideline-disconcordant treatment, 87% was more broad-spectrum than guideline-recommended treatment. A microbiological diagnosis was established in 96 visits (35%). The susceptibility of the pathogens isolated from patients treated with guideline-concordant treatment (n = 68) and guideline-disconcordant treatment (n = 28) to guideline-recommended treatment (91% versus 89%) and to prescribed treatment (91% versus 93%) was similar (p = 0.77 and p = 0.79, respectively). In conclusion, non-adherence to the guidelines occurred frequently and resulted in more broad-spectrum empirical therapy. This did not result in a higher rate of susceptibility of the isolated pathogens to the prescribed empirical therapy.

Serial and panel analyses of biomarkers do not improve the prediction of bacteremia compared to one procalcitonin measurement

“…To include more resistant but often less prevalent pathogens, the empirical therapy of a severe infection is usually broad-spectrum. 5,10 The downside of this strategy is that the prescribed antibiotics are often more broad-spectrum than necessary 11 or even are used in the absence of a bacterial infection. 12,13 This may have potentially deleterious consequences such as anaphylactic reactions, antibiotic resistance, and high costs.…”

Hospital-Acquired Infections After Cardiac Surgery and Current Physician Practices: A Retrospective Cohort Study

“…Of particular interest are previous studies that have shown that infections are commonly diagnosed with limited clinical criteria and often treated without lab confirmation [4]. Beyond this, antibiotic treatment is often continued after negative lab results are received [5].…”

Evaluation of the decision support system for antimicrobial treatment, TREAT, in an acute medical ward of a university hospital

“…9,10 In sepsis patients, non-adherence to guidelines can result in more broadspectrum treatment but not more appropriate treatment. 11 In other settings it has been shown that including physicians in the development of local guidelines and thereby giving them responsibility and ownership, facilitates adherence to local guidelines. 12 Other strategies are the combination of intense education, feedback, and evaluation, or the introduction of a simple monitoring form that increases the focus on prescription and the use of antimicrobial treatment.…”