2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219199713500259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-abelian cohomology jump loci from an analytic viewpoint

Abstract: For a space, we investigate its CJL (cohomology jump loci), sitting inside varieties of representations of the fundamental group. To do this, for a CDG (commutative differential graded) algebra, we define its CJL, sitting inside varieties of flat connections. The analytic germs at the origin 1 of representation varieties are shown to be determined by the Sullivan 1-minimal model of the space. Up to a degree q, the two types of CJL have the same analytic germs at the origins, when the space and the algebra have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Proposition , we associate to every special cocycle τZdouble-struckkfalse(scriptAfalse)Bdouble-struckkfalse(scriptAfalse) an embedding prefixevτ:Hdouble-struckkfalse(frakturgfalse)Ffalse(A(A)double-struckC,frakturgfalse), which preserves the regular parts. Building on recent work from , we then exploit this construction in two ways, for g=fraktursl2false(double-struckCfalse). On one hand, as noted in Remark , the construction gives the inverse of the map λk from Theorem (i).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Proposition , we associate to every special cocycle τZdouble-struckkfalse(scriptAfalse)Bdouble-struckkfalse(scriptAfalse) an embedding prefixevτ:Hdouble-struckkfalse(frakturgfalse)Ffalse(A(A)double-struckC,frakturgfalse), which preserves the regular parts. Building on recent work from , we then exploit this construction in two ways, for g=fraktursl2false(double-struckCfalse). On one hand, as noted in Remark , the construction gives the inverse of the map λk from Theorem (i).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theorem follows from [, Corollary 2.2] and Theorem , and refines [, Theorem C(2)]; see also [, Theorem 1.3(1)]. The Budur–Wang jump loci finiteness obstruction from Theorem may be used to give a negative answer to Question , even for spaces X which are finite CW‐complexes.…”
Section: Cohomology Jump Loci Finiteness Properties and Largenessmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Let X be a path‐connected space with fundamental group π=π1false(Xfalse). The cohomology jump loci with coefficients in rank 1 complex local systems on X are powerful homotopy‐type invariants of the space, that have been the subject of intense investigation in recent years, see for instance . These loci sit inside the complex algebraic group π̂:= Hom false(π,C×false), and are defined for all i,r0 by Vrifalse(Xfalse)=false{ρtrueπ̂prefixdimHi(X,double-struckCρ)rfalse},where Cρ is the rank 1 local system on X associated to a representation ρ:πdouble-struckC×, that is, the vector space double-struckC viewed as a module over the group algebra C[π] via the action g·a=ρ(g)a, for gπ and aC.…”
Section: Cohomology Jump Loci Finiteness Properties and Largenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations