1999
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.61.010305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Abelian Berry connections for quantum computation

Abstract: In the holonomic approach to quantum computation information is encoded in a degenerate eigenspace of a parametric family of Hamiltonians and manipulated by the associated holonomic gates. These are realized in terms of the non-abelian Berry connection and are obtained by driving the control parameters along adiabatic loops. We show how it is possible, for a specific model, to explicitly determine the loops generating any desired logical gate, thus producing a universal set of unitary transformations. In a mul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
274
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
274
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zanardi and Rasetti in [6] and [7] proposed such an idea using non-abelian Berry phase (quantum holonomy). See also [8] and [9] as another geometric models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zanardi and Rasetti in [6] and [7] proposed such an idea using non-abelian Berry phase (quantum holonomy). See also [8] and [9] as another geometric models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been proposed that controllable quantum operations can be achieved by a novel geometric principle as well [2,3]. When a quantum system undergoes an adiabatic cyclic evolution, it acquires a nontrivial geometric operation called a holonomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, it becomes a non-Abelian unitary operation, i.e., a non-trivial rotation in the eigenspace. It has been shown that universal quantum computation is possible by means of holonomies only [2,3]. Further, holonomic quantum computation schemes have intrinsic tolerance to certain types of computational errors [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, decoherence-free subspaces (DFS) and noiseless subsystems (NS) [21,22,23,24] are based on the symmetry of the system-bath interaction, so do not require active detection and correction of errors. Another passive technique, holonomic quantum computation, is robust against stochastic errors in the control process [25,26]. When conditions are appropriate, passive strategies can be applied during the design of quantum algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%