2021
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐A non‐B aortic dissection: A literature review

Abstract: Non‐A non‐B aortic dissections are an infrequent occurrence and represent a small proportion of aortic dissections. Treating this life‐threatening medical emergency often requires surgeons to undertake some one of the most challenging surgical or endovascular cases in medicine. This literature review aims to define and classify non‐A non‐B dissections, describe their epidemiology as well as their pathology. This review also aims to discuss the range of surgical techniques employed in their treatment and manage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach provides an ideal landing zone for secondary endovascular or open surgical interventions. TEVAR in non-A non-B dissection patients presenting the entry in the aortic arch is unsuitable due to the exceptionally high risk of retrograde aortic dissection of type A [6,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Acute Aortic Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach provides an ideal landing zone for secondary endovascular or open surgical interventions. TEVAR in non-A non-B dissection patients presenting the entry in the aortic arch is unsuitable due to the exceptionally high risk of retrograde aortic dissection of type A [6,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Acute Aortic Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow‐up was conducted semiannually for the first 3 years, then annually. Six years after index repair, a new aortic dissection involving the distal portion of the aortic arch, left subclavian artery, and extending into the thoracoabdominal aorta was detected (non‐A, non‐B aortic dissection 3 ) on CT angiogram, performed due to the patient presenting acutely with symptoms of back pain. Given the underlying collagen disease and other prognostic factors such as age, patient condition, and previous cardiac surgery, surgery was performed to replace the aortic arch, including a debranching of the supra‐aortic vessels using FET technique in an attempt to close a possible re‐entry in the descending aorta.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%