2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45402-0_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NoMoRe: A System for Non-Monotonic Reasoning under Answer Set Semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Answer Set Programming (ASP) [18,19,11,32] is a powerful logic-based programming language which is enjoying increasing interest within the scientific community also thanks to the availability of a number of efficient implementations [27,15,23,29,30,2]. DLV [27] is one of the most successful and widely used ASP systems, which has stimulated some interest also in industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Answer Set Programming (ASP) [18,19,11,32] is a powerful logic-based programming language which is enjoying increasing interest within the scientific community also thanks to the availability of a number of efficient implementations [27,15,23,29,30,2]. DLV [27] is one of the most successful and widely used ASP systems, which has stimulated some interest also in industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, our next result will show that various questions about the least model of an arbitrary recursive ESB Horn program are 1 1 hard. Note that theorem 2.4 allowed us to prove that the least model of a ESB Horn program is r.e.…”
Section: The Complexity Of the Least Model Of A Recursive Esb Horn Prmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given a recursive ESB Horn program P , there is a 0 1 monotone operator such that the least model M of P is the closure of started on the empty set, which is automatically 1 1 by the classical result of Spector [38]. For the completeness, we will define a recursive ESB Horn program P with recursive constraints and least fixed point M such that Now consider the one-step provability operator T P for P .…”
Section: Theorem 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations