2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomogram-based prediction model for survival of COVID-19 patients: A clinical study

Jinxin Xu,
Wenshan Zhang,
Yingjie Cai
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these validation methods indicate a good performance of the risk prediction nomogram, characterized by a C-index of 0.8137 (95% CI, 0.7211-0.9063) and an outstanding AUC of 0.9556 (95% CI, 0.9063-1.000). Since the beginning of the pandemic, numerous prognostic nomograms generally based on clinical characteristics, CT scans, and routine laboratory tests were built in an attempt to predict COVID-19 severity, mortality, and survival [40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Yao et al developed a risk predictive nomogram for COVID-19 severity based on routine laboratory parameters as CRP (Creactive protein), ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase), age and the Charlson comorbidity score [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these validation methods indicate a good performance of the risk prediction nomogram, characterized by a C-index of 0.8137 (95% CI, 0.7211-0.9063) and an outstanding AUC of 0.9556 (95% CI, 0.9063-1.000). Since the beginning of the pandemic, numerous prognostic nomograms generally based on clinical characteristics, CT scans, and routine laboratory tests were built in an attempt to predict COVID-19 severity, mortality, and survival [40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Yao et al developed a risk predictive nomogram for COVID-19 severity based on routine laboratory parameters as CRP (Creactive protein), ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase), age and the Charlson comorbidity score [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%