1991
DOI: 10.1515/prbs.1991.3.3.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominals and Nominalizations in Catalan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
146
0
31

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
146
0
31
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative to the bundling model splits number and gender features; they are projected and valued independently (Picallo 1991;Antón-Méndez et al 2002;Carminati 2005). Under the split model, gender morphology hosted on the nominal spine heads its own gender projection (GenP), which is dominated by the number projection (NumP), as in (2).…”
Section: Background: Feature Representation In the Native Spanish Basmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative to the bundling model splits number and gender features; they are projected and valued independently (Picallo 1991;Antón-Méndez et al 2002;Carminati 2005). Under the split model, gender morphology hosted on the nominal spine heads its own gender projection (GenP), which is dominated by the number projection (NumP), as in (2).…”
Section: Background: Feature Representation In the Native Spanish Basmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discussão da configuração estrutural da concordância e a inserção do morfema PL neste capítulo baseia-se na noção da estrutura do SD (ABNEY, 1987) que define o SN (material lexical) como complemento da classe D (determinante), e apoia-se nas perspectivas de Picallo (1991) propõem que o PE e o PB manifestam diferentes realizações do morfema associado com a pluralidade. Assim, os morfemas podem se adjungir a núcleos independentemente do processo de movimento, e os morfemas podem ser realizados de duas maneiras: como morfemas dissociados, que não figuram na sintaxe propriamente dita, mas são inseridos após spell-out, como um reflexo de configurações sintáticas; ou como morfemas singleton, que se adjungem aos elementos funcionais que ancoram a informação sobre o número e a referência.…”
Section: Enquadramento Teóricounclassified
“…As the examples in (17) remind us, there is ample crosslinguistic evidence for a possessive-phrase on top of QP and below the DP projection, from a variety of languages and authors: (17) Seminal work by Szabolcsi is taken in the generative tradition as the main reference for proposing a functional projection right below DP connected with possessives; similar conclusions have been reached independently by many scholars, which may differ in the qualification of that functional projection: nominal inflection (Szabolcsi 1994 and related work); possessor (De Wit 1997, Delsing 1998, Schoolemmer 1998; Number (Picallo 1991); or just AGR (Alexiadou et. al.…”
Section: Arguments For Locating Genitives Above Qpmentioning
confidence: 93%