Nominal Versus Real Convergence – EMU Entry Scenarios for the New Member States

Abstract

This paper explores the conflict of real and monetary convergence during the EMU run-up of the Central and Eastern European member states. Using a Balassa-Samuelson model of productivity driven inflation, we find a high probability of higher inflation in the new member states. We compare the policy options which make the compliance possible, i.e. fiscal tightening and nominal appreciation within the ERM2 band. Nominal appreciation within ERM2 seems the better option to achieve the compliance with the Maastricht criteria, as no discretionary government intervention is necessary, and losses in terms of real growth are smaller. Having once opted for nominal appreciation by fixing the ERM2 entry rate as the central rate (Irish model), a high degree of flexibility is provided in coping with erratic short-term capital inflows. The strategy of setting the ERM2 entry rate above the central rate (Greek model) implies a clear exchange rate path within ERM2 and thereby less exchange rate volatility. Despite the merits of nominal appreciation, countries committed to hard euro pegs, or with high budget deficits, may choose fiscal contraction as a solution. Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd..

Exchange Rate Volatility and Growth in Small Open Economies at the EMU Periphery

“…Building upon Balassa (1964) and Samuelson (1964) the industrial catch-up (of emerging market economies) leads to two (alternative) economic policy outcomes (De Grauwe and Schnabl 2005b). (1) If exchange rates are fixed, the relative productivity gains drive up wages and prices.…”

Monetary Policy before Euro Adoption: Challenges for EU New Members

“…Regardless of the choice of exchange rate regime, during the period of fulfilment of the criteria each euro-candidate will be faced with the question of setting the suitable parity against the euro (see de Grauwe and Schnabl, 2005). The experience of the countries that are fulfilling, or have already fulfilled the criteria, speaks in favour of fixing the parity at the current market value.…”

“…The requirement to fulfil these "Maastricht criteria" before entering the euro area implies a number of challenges for domestic economic policy-makers in relation to the state of the economy (see Angeloni et al, 2005, Buiter and Grafe, 2002, Coricelli, 2002, de Grauwe and Schnabl, 2005, Hochreiter and Tavlas, 2004, or Dabrowski and Rostowski, 2006. This article focuses on the challenges ensuing from the Maastricht criteria for the monetary policies of the relevant countries' national central banks.…”

Measuring Nominal and Real Convergence of Selected CEE Countries by the Taylor Rule

“…Despite this criticism, the Maastricht criteria are still relevant for all Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Once a country fulfills the criteria, it has to abolish its national currency and adopt the Euro [De Grauwe, Schnabl, 2005].…”