2016
DOI: 10.1561/2500000017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominal Game Semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, research on the -calculus has led to significant developments in different directions, including memory references (e.g. [Jeffrey and Rathke 1999;Laird 2004;Murawski and Tzevelekos 2016]) and cryptographic protocols (e.g. [Sumii and Pierce 2003]).…”
Section: Related Work and Context 61 Names In Computer Science And Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, research on the -calculus has led to significant developments in different directions, including memory references (e.g. [Jeffrey and Rathke 1999;Laird 2004;Murawski and Tzevelekos 2016]) and cryptographic protocols (e.g. [Sumii and Pierce 2003]).…”
Section: Related Work and Context 61 Names In Computer Science And Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Game semantics views computation as a dialogue between the environment (Opponent, O ) and the program (Proponent, P ). We give an overview of the fully abstract game model of [28]. Let be a collection of countably infinite sets of reference names , or just names .…”
Section: Game Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, in Sect. 3 we introduce the game model of GRef (we refer the interested reader to [28] for a detailed account of the model, which is in effect a restricted version of game models for larger languages presented in [19,24]). The first main results are obtained in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E.g., depending on the considered language, various constraints are imposed upon strategies, like innocence or well-bracketing. Further sources of diversity have appeared with recent extensions, e.g., sheaf-based innocence [37], nominal models [32], tensorial logic [30], or concurrent extensions [18,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%