2018 41st International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2018.8441168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise Variance Estimation in Digital Images using Finite Differences Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike traditional transform domains and statistical approaches, they can adapt to different noise distributions and scene structures. They can also be combined with air domain and frequency domain processing tools [ 34 , 35 ], providing greater flexibility and applicability. However, the method also has some challenges, such as selecting the appropriate patch size and image coverage and reducing the interference of the original image structure information in the noise estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike traditional transform domains and statistical approaches, they can adapt to different noise distributions and scene structures. They can also be combined with air domain and frequency domain processing tools [ 34 , 35 ], providing greater flexibility and applicability. However, the method also has some challenges, such as selecting the appropriate patch size and image coverage and reducing the interference of the original image structure information in the noise estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some methods to filter the image content signal and then treat the filtered image as noise. For example, Kowalski [9] utilizes the finite‐difference filter to remove the original image signal and then calculates the STD according to the retained noise information. However, the edge information of the image is often mistaken for noise, which greatly reduces the accuracy of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%