2009
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2012677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise Reduction in a Non-Homogenous Ground Penetrating Radar Problem by Multiobjective Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that in this paper the noise is not considered. Here we just offer a principle of velocity measurement and the noise can be reduced by other methods such as the way in [16]. How to obtain the target velocity in engineering will be discussed later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notice that in this paper the noise is not considered. Here we just offer a principle of velocity measurement and the noise can be reduced by other methods such as the way in [16]. How to obtain the target velocity in engineering will be discussed later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the typical Lorenz chaotic system is used for illustration and it is shown in Eq. (16). The radar signal is generated by 1 x component in the Lorenz chaotic system.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a typical GPR procedure to detect underground targets can be summarized as: the received time waveform can be described as the convolution of a number of time functions each representing the impulse response of some component of the radar system in addition to noise contributions [5,41]. It is possible to simplify a GPR received time waveform as follows:…”
Section: Generic Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] Frequency response function (FRF) and ANN. [41] Multiobjective neural networks (MNNs). [42] ANNs and curve fitting techniques.…”
Section: Background: Ann and ML For Gprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26], the authors propose to enhance the GPR signal with the Karhunen-Loève transform (KLT), whereas the work in [27] aims at improving the SNR of a GPR signal by introducing an enhanced-signal-based method, with the noise variance being estimated by a clustering technique. Furthermore, a novel pre-processing method for GPR signals, based on the minimum gradient method, is discussed in [28]. Within the most established signal processing techniques performed in the GPR area we can cite time and frequency analyses [29], time varying band-pass filtering [30], deconvolution [31], velocity analysis [32], migration [33] and compressive sensing [34], as well as the attribute analysis and classification [35].…”
Section: Still At the European Level A Number Of Standards And Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%