2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.105865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise reduction by Brillouin spectrum reassembly in Brillouin optical time domain sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AM n change caused by each NLM parameter is 9.55%, 0.05%, and −0.04%, respectively, which indicates that the decrease in AM is mainly caused by the GSP. It is worth noting that if all the NLM parameters are optimal, the FWHM of the denoised trace only expands by only 2.56% compared with that of the clean trace, which is much less than the previous results [13,14,19,20,22]. The total signal amplitude is reduced by 9.25% compared with the clean trace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AM n change caused by each NLM parameter is 9.55%, 0.05%, and −0.04%, respectively, which indicates that the decrease in AM is mainly caused by the GSP. It is worth noting that if all the NLM parameters are optimal, the FWHM of the denoised trace only expands by only 2.56% compared with that of the clean trace, which is much less than the previous results [13,14,19,20,22]. The total signal amplitude is reduced by 9.25% compared with the clean trace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore, various methods, such as wavelet denoising, Bilateral filter, Block Matching and 3D filtering, and video-Block Matching and 3D filtering, have been attempted to improve the SR besides the measurement accuracy (MA) [5,[8][9][10]. Recent studies have shown that the SR for ideal data and original noisy data is 0.4 m, and it retains 0.4 m by Brillouin spectrum-reassembly filter, but the SR deteriorates to 1.5 m by NLM filter [19]. The combination of NLM and Gaussian filter can effectively improve the performance of the distributed Brillouin fiber sensor compared to the results obtained with NLM, enabling a 22% improvement in MA in the non-transition section and an 84% improvement in SR in the transition section [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen from formula (1), the response frequency of BOTDR mainly has five constraints: Factor one is the key to the distributed positioning of the system, which cannot be improved due to material limitation; Factor 2: Many researchers have proposed schemes such as pulse coding for the signal-to-noise ratio of the system to reduce the cumulative number of noise reduction [10] . Factor three exists in the sweeping frequency method, which is difficult to improve due to industrial conditions, but it can be ignored for time-frequency analysis, slope assistance and other technical solutions that do not require sweeping frequency.…”
Section: Principle and Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, researchers of the Brillouin Spectrum denoising algorithm take advantage of the characteristics of the BOTDA system's BGS data points as pixels in the image, and use image-processing algorithms for denoising to improve the SNR of the BOTDA system and enhance the precision of the BFS extraction, so as to obtain more accurate distributed temperature measurement values [20][21][22]. The image-processing algorithm, Non-Local Means (NLM), is a widely used denoising method, which uses the non-local self-similarity of an image to collect the most similar image blocks and perform a weighted average to obtain the current pixel value, so that the denoising effect is greatly improved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%