2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise in Turbulence Measurements Using Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry

Abstract: To validate the use of acoustic Doppler velocimeters (ADVs) for the measurement of turbulent flows, experiments were conducted in i) an axisymmetric turbulent jet, and ii) approximately homogenous isotropic turbulence with zero mean flow. The jet experiments show that the horizontal RMS velocities measured by the ADV were overestimated when compared to both flying hot-film anemometry measurements and 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(85 reference statements)
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These errors are caused by intrinsic Doppler noise, aliasing of the Doppler signal and perhaps due to the velocity gradient in the sampling volume [30,31]. Specific post-processing methods have been developed to remove such spikes in the raw velocity signal, aiming at the removal of any outliers and filtering of the records, such as the algorithms of Goring and Nikora [30] and Khorsandi et al [32]. Herein, the raw velocity data collected by the ADV were post-processed using the method developed by Goring and Nikora [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These errors are caused by intrinsic Doppler noise, aliasing of the Doppler signal and perhaps due to the velocity gradient in the sampling volume [30,31]. Specific post-processing methods have been developed to remove such spikes in the raw velocity signal, aiming at the removal of any outliers and filtering of the records, such as the algorithms of Goring and Nikora [30] and Khorsandi et al [32]. Herein, the raw velocity data collected by the ADV were post-processed using the method developed by Goring and Nikora [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments have been carried out with the Vectrino both fixed in an axisymmetric turbulent jet (Reynolds number ca. 11,000), and translated at constant speed through approximately homogeneous isotropic turbulence with zero mean flow produced by a randomly-actuated jet array (RJA) [5]. The axisymmetric jet results indicated that RMS turbulence levels measured with the Vectrino were 30% greater than expected on the basis of earlier hotfilm and laser Doppler velocimetry measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The axisymmetric jet results indicated that RMS turbulence levels measured with the Vectrino were 30% greater than expected on the basis of earlier hotfilm and laser Doppler velocimetry measurements. The RJA experiments indicated that the noise was not a function of mean flow speed, and on this basis [5] concluded that the higher RMS levels were not Doppler noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, the device actually measures the velocity of the particles in the flow, rather than that of the flow itself [Nortek, 2009], but the assumption that the particle velocity is equal to the water velocity is valid for fine sediment traveling as washload [Hosseini et al, 2006;Elci et al, 2009]. ADV's have several advantages over other velocity measurement techniques, including robustness, capability to measure instantaneous 3D velocities at high sampling rates, a lack of calibration requirements, and portability [Khorsandi et al, 2012]. Additionally, since the measurement sampling volume is approximately 5 cm below the probes [Nortek, 2009], measurements are collected nonintrusively in the flow ].…”
Section: Acoustic Doppler Velocimetermentioning
confidence: 99%