1975
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2220700202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise in Single and Double Injection Currents in Solids (II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, for 1 < l < 10 and 1 < α < 100 the exact result should be used. The dependence of the noise power as the square root of the current corresponds to the well known double thermal noise regime found in space charge limited devices 4,5 (see Eq. ( 2)).…”
Section: B Inhomogeneous Stationary Profilesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Otherwise, for 1 < l < 10 and 1 < α < 100 the exact result should be used. The dependence of the noise power as the square root of the current corresponds to the well known double thermal noise regime found in space charge limited devices 4,5 (see Eq. ( 2)).…”
Section: B Inhomogeneous Stationary Profilesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…(1) are expected. These deviations have been studied in detail in two limiting cases, namely: (i) when the structure behaves as a space charge limited diode (with a strong inhomogeneous profile of the free carrier density), [4][5][6] and (ii) when the structure behaves as a linear resistor (with a homogeneous profile of the free carrier density). 7 In the former case (i) the current I displays a quadratic dependence on the applied voltage V (Mott-Gurney law) I = βV 2 , where β is a sample dependent parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suppression effect is well established in crystalline semiconductors both theoretically and experimentally for 1/f noise due to mobility fluctuations 14 and GR noise involving a small number of trap levels. 15,16 In any case, the degree of suppression is inherently sensitive to the injecting properties of the contacts that, unfortunately, could not be controlled to a sufficient degree, 17 in spite of the care taken in device preparation.…”
Section: Electron Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%