2017
DOI: 10.5194/gi-6-329-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise in raw data from magnetic observatories

Abstract: Abstract. In spite of significant progress in the development of new devices for magnetic measurements, mathematical and computational technologies for data processing and means of communication, the quality of magnetic data accessible through the data centres (for example, World Data Centres or INTERMAGNET) still largely depends on the actual conditions in which observation of the Earth's magnetic field is performed at observatories. Processing of raw data of magnetic measurements by observatory staff plays a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such perturbations penetrate simultaneously at all longitudinal sectors and follow the same trend as B z oscillations (Kikuchi et al, 1996). However, the short‐period observed oscillations which are not simultaneous may be associated with local noise at the respective station (Khomutov et al, 2017). The process of penetration of the magnetospheric convection electric field varies with longitude; in this regard Fejer et al, (2008) established a model of PPEF based on ROCSAT satellite measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such perturbations penetrate simultaneously at all longitudinal sectors and follow the same trend as B z oscillations (Kikuchi et al, 1996). However, the short‐period observed oscillations which are not simultaneous may be associated with local noise at the respective station (Khomutov et al, 2017). The process of penetration of the magnetospheric convection electric field varies with longitude; in this regard Fejer et al, (2008) established a model of PPEF based on ROCSAT satellite measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 provides general information about these observatories, and Figure 1 shows the data status graphically. More detailed description of modern equipment of there observatories is presented in [6,7]. Due to various problems during perestroika in the 90s, many magnetic observatories in the former USSR, including the observatories of IKIR FEB RAS, significantly reduced their activity.…”
Section: State Of An Archival Data Of the Magnetic Observatories Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exchange of primary data and standardization of measurements at magnetic observatories (MO) of IKIR are a good tool for choice of the optimal parameters of magnetometers (for example, dIdD or POS-1), for identification of errors and failures in device operation, for the detection and interpretation of noise [14]. As an example of the joint processing of IKIR IMOs data, Figure 7 shows fragments of the magnetic declination D records on 24.05.2013, on which a signal from a strong earthquake with a magnitude of Ms=7.5 is observed.…”
Section: Observatories Of Ikir Feb Rasmentioning
confidence: 99%