2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37172-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise in GMR and TMR Sensors

Abstract: Abstract. Giant Magnetoresistances (GMR) and Tunnel Magnetoresistances (TMR) take an increasing part in many applications like current sensing, magnetometry or position sensing, thanks to their high magnetoresistance at room temperature, which leads to a large output signal variation. But the real performances of such sensors can only be estimated with respect to the sources of noise. In this chapter, we give first some bases on noise theory and data treatment. Fluctuations, ergodicity and volume consideration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GMR devices are subject to fluctuations, among which the main components are the thermal noise and the 1/f noise37. Noise spectral density measurements were performed in a magnetically shielded room.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GMR devices are subject to fluctuations, among which the main components are the thermal noise and the 1/f noise37. Noise spectral density measurements were performed in a magnetically shielded room.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter method is superior in terms of quantifying the sensor's intrinsic properties that are independent of experimental parameters, but is more complex, requiring a measurement of the power spectral density (PSD) of the intrinsic noise floor. The detection limit under this approach is obtained by dividing the noise √ by the sensor's sensitivity [52][53][54] (change in output signal per change in magnetic field), and the dimension of Hz -1/2 in the resulting quantity arises from the noise spectrum in this ratio. This characterization is more suitable for making comparisons across sensors that have different structures and detection mechanisms and may be tested under different parameters.…”
Section: Note On Magnetic Sensor Detection Limits and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, under the first method, the lowest detectable magnetic field signal can be arbitrarily improved by methods like increasing acquisition time or averaging. However, the PSD is already normalized by acquisition time [52], thus removing this source of arbitrariness.…”
Section: Note On Magnetic Sensor Detection Limits and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. The noise level is converted into Hooge factor [7], [8], to allow direct comparison with other studies: α H (μm 2 ) = (A × f )/V 2 × S V (H), where A is the junction area (20μm 2 ), f the frequency (≈ 1 kHz), V the biased voltage (0.1 V) and S V (H) the noise under precise magnetic conditions. Fig.…”
Section: Noise Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%