2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41494-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise in Chemical Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minors have less room to house receptors and neurons that can perceive and process the nestmate recognition labels, since body surface and volume increase exponentially with size and receptor density is stable across Acromyrmex castes (Abramowski et al, 2010;Gill et al, 2013). Fewer receptors and a smaller neural network size decrease the sensitivity and accuracy of recognition (Hopkins, 1983;Wyatt, 2003;Spaethe et al, 2007;Chittka and Niven, 2009;Nehring et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Minors have less room to house receptors and neurons that can perceive and process the nestmate recognition labels, since body surface and volume increase exponentially with size and receptor density is stable across Acromyrmex castes (Abramowski et al, 2010;Gill et al, 2013). Fewer receptors and a smaller neural network size decrease the sensitivity and accuracy of recognition (Hopkins, 1983;Wyatt, 2003;Spaethe et al, 2007;Chittka and Niven, 2009;Nehring et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, this strategy requires olfactory receptors that are highly specific to a given ligand and central circuits which allow for a quick and hard-wired translation of a chemical stimulus into a specific behavioral response ( Wilson and Stevenson, 2006 ). Further, this strategy requires that the “key” or “character impact” compound in question is reliably present in the odor mixture and that it can be reliably detected against the noise of the other compounds that are part of the odor mixture as well as against the chemical background noise in the environment ( Nehring et al, 2013 ). Thus, this strategy also requires a high olfactory sensitivity for such a compound in species for which the corresponding odor is behaviorally relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible strategy for an animal to recognize a complex odor mixture is to rely on only one or a few “key” or “character impact” compound(s) which determine its odor identity ( Dunkel et al, 2014 ). This strategy, of course, requires that the compound in question is reliably present in the odor mixture and that it can be reliably detected against the noise of the other compounds ( Nehring et al, 2013 ). Thus, a high olfactory sensitivity for such a “key” or “character impact” compound should be expected in species for which the corresponding odor mixture is behaviorally relevant ( Laska et al, 2005 ; Sarrafchi et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All else being equal, individuals with lower concentrations of recognition cues should be less likely to be attacked by discriminators [ 13 ]. Even if relative abundance of substances in the recognition labels differed between the discriminator and a non-nestmate, the discriminator is expected to not perceive these differences if the substances in question are below a hypothetical physiological detection threshold (low concentration, [ 38 ]). Therefore, theory predicts that cockroaches from Acromyrmex colonies should receive less aggression than those from Atta colonies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%