1986
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/31/5/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise and threshold contrast characteristics of a digital fluorographic system

Abstract: The noise and threshold contrast characteristics of a Picker DAS 211 digital fluorography system are described. Leeds test objects were used to measure contrast-detail-dose relationships for digital fluorography and the results compared with similar measurements using screen-film radiography and 100 mm photofluorography. Noise and spread function measurements were made and from them threshold contrast (CT) values were calculated using the theory of signal detection developed by Hay and Chesters. Comparison wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be assumed that the quantum motions of both the incident X-rays and the image noise follow a Poisson distribution [11,12]. When an event occurs exactly λ times, which, on average, occurs r times per unit time, the probability P(r) follows a Poisson distribution defined as follows:…”
Section: Adding Image Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be assumed that the quantum motions of both the incident X-rays and the image noise follow a Poisson distribution [11,12]. When an event occurs exactly λ times, which, on average, occurs r times per unit time, the probability P(r) follows a Poisson distribution defined as follows:…”
Section: Adding Image Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbaric et a1 (1982) have described a fluorographic system for digital subtraction in which an image isocon television camera views a 30.5 x 22.9 cm rare-earth Screen via an angled mirror, in a design similar to that employed in a radiotherapy simulator by Thompson (1979) and Harrison and Farmer (1978).…”
Section: Digital Radiography 763mentioning
confidence: 99%