2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise and Epigenetic Inheritance of Single-Cell Division Times Influence Population Fitness

Abstract: The fitness effect of biological noise remains unclear. For example, even within clonal microbial populations, individual cells grow at different speeds. Although it is known that the individuals' mean growth speed can affect population-level fitness, it is unclear how or whether growth speed heterogeneity itself is subject to natural selection. Here, we show that noisy single-cell division times can significantly affect population-level growth rate. Using time-lapse microscopy to measure the division times of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
113
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenotypic differences in genetically identical populations have been observed in a variety of experimental settings (Cerulus et al, 2016; reviewed in Raj and van Oudenaarden, 2008; Raser and O’Shea, 2005). Variability can arise from stochastic synthesis and degradation of molecules (Elowitz et al, 2002; Paulsson, 2004) as well as binomial partitioning at cell division (Huh and Paulsson, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phenotypic differences in genetically identical populations have been observed in a variety of experimental settings (Cerulus et al, 2016; reviewed in Raj and van Oudenaarden, 2008; Raser and O’Shea, 2005). Variability can arise from stochastic synthesis and degradation of molecules (Elowitz et al, 2002; Paulsson, 2004) as well as binomial partitioning at cell division (Huh and Paulsson, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased variance has the potential to enhance population fitness in euploid populations (Cerulus et al, 2016); therefore, aneuploidy may occur in evolution as a mechanism to further increase population variance, and thus fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on the case where the CV is roughly constant and without the consideration of epigenetic inheritance; but for cases where the CCDD are poorly mean scaled, epigenetics make a big impact, or the mean cycle duration is limited while τ * is effectively zero, we want to make it clear to the reader that the results of this paper are incomplete and wish to direct them to the work referenced above. 19,20 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) especially for microorganisms for which this influence remains largely unexplored (although see Cerulus et al . for a recent example). Similarly, TrackScar can be used to estimate fitness variation which is a fundamental parameter in models of adaptation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power of model organisms like S. cerevisiae coupled with the TrackScar method offers to evolutionary biologists and ecologists the tools to deeply test whether and how individuals behaviour can effect changes in the mean phenotype of a population independent of natural selection (e.g. Ozgul et al 2009) especially for microorganisms for which this influence remains largely unexplored (although see Cerulus et al 2016 for a recent example). Similarly, TrackScar can be used to estimate fitness variation which is a fundamental parameter in models of adaptation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%