Many successful land-bridge projects have been constructed around the world. This fact has led the Israeli government to design a land bridge from Eilat Port on the Red Sea coast to the Ashdod Port on the Mediterranean Sea coast. The planned project is expected to realize many benefits and profits. These are grouped into two groups. The first group comprises considerations associated with freight shipment: consolidation, specialization, and the economic analysis and viability with respect to freight shipment and transshipment. The second group is the social and economic benefits of this project to Israel with respect to connecting the southern periphery with the center of Israel. Recently, the Israeli government approved the construction of a railway to Eilat [4]. This project will bring many benefits and advantages to the Negev area (i.e., the southern part of Israel). Currently, the railway system of Israel is connected to the Mediterranean Sea, but there is no train connecting the Red Sea. A new railway from the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea as is suggested by the Israeli government and shown in Figure 1, will be able to compete against the Suez Canal just as the United States trains are a competition for the marine transport going through the Panama Canal. Consequently, as we show in this paper, the new railway will create many new jobs for numerous Israelis and will generate immense revenues to Israel economy. This new transportation project's vision is analogous to the vision of the prominent Interstate Highway system constructed by the 34th President of the United States Dwight David Eisenhower [ 5 , 6 ]. Similar to the Interstate Highway System, the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea railway has these benefits: • Positive impact on the Israel economy by expanding access to freight and reducing freight costs and subsequently improving the economic efficiency and productivity. • Increased access to the less expensive land of the vast Negev region and the development of the Negev area.