2010
DOI: 10.3138/cjccj.52.2.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nœuds ou champs ? Analyse de l'expertise internationale sur la criminalité transnationale organisée et le terrorisme

Abstract: Benoît DupontTitulaire de la Chaire de recherche du Canada en sécurité, identité et technologie, Université de Montréal qu'épistémologique, que cet article se propose d'analyser. Cet article a ainsi pour objectif d'apporter un éclairage sur un de ces groupes d'experts en particulier, et de mesurer, sur la base de données empiriques souvent délicates à réunir, la pertinence de deux approches théoriques développées en sciences sociales : la théorie des champs et celle de la gouvernance nodale.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Roma-Lyon Group consists of country experts organized into six sub-groups: (1) Criminal and Legal Affairs; (2) Transportation Security; (3) Law Enforcement; (4) Migration Experts; (5) High Tech Crime; and (6) Counter Terrorism Practitioners. Group members meet three times per year, but as a common practice, members are in continuous communication throughout the year (Scherrer and Dupont 2010, 163). As a network driven by “securocrats” (Pawlak 2009), the organizing principle of the group does not follow a negotiation model, but a consensus model where a group of experts—largely from justice departments, and policing or security agencies—could establish a working agenda.…”
Section: Examining the Roma-lyon Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Roma-Lyon Group consists of country experts organized into six sub-groups: (1) Criminal and Legal Affairs; (2) Transportation Security; (3) Law Enforcement; (4) Migration Experts; (5) High Tech Crime; and (6) Counter Terrorism Practitioners. Group members meet three times per year, but as a common practice, members are in continuous communication throughout the year (Scherrer and Dupont 2010, 163). As a network driven by “securocrats” (Pawlak 2009), the organizing principle of the group does not follow a negotiation model, but a consensus model where a group of experts—largely from justice departments, and policing or security agencies—could establish a working agenda.…”
Section: Examining the Roma-lyon Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G8 Roma Lyon group is a practitioner-led network consisting of expert representatives from the G8/7 nations in areas of security, policing, and counter-terrorism. Since the G8—and its subgroups—have no secretariat and, given the secretive nature of a) security governance issues, and b) G8 meetings in general, there is very little information regarding the activities of the Roma-Lyon Group (with the exception of Scherrer 2009; Scherrer and Dupont 2010). Notwithstanding, we do know that the central rationale for the group is to develop and distill “best practices” in the field of transnational organized crime and counter-terrorism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Guiraudon [33], Lavenex[45], Kaunert and Léonard[41] 19. Bigo[5], Sheptycki[68], Scherrer and Dupont[66] 20. Monar[56] 21.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%