2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodular fasciitis: a sarcomatous impersonator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a predilection in males has been suggested, our case series showed no sex predilection, with an approximately equal number of boys and girls. Tomita et al 6 presented 25 cases of nodular fasciitis over a 10-year period. Of the 3 patients younger than 18 years in the series, 1 had a lesion located in the forehead and those of the others were in the chest wall and left flank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a predilection in males has been suggested, our case series showed no sex predilection, with an approximately equal number of boys and girls. Tomita et al 6 presented 25 cases of nodular fasciitis over a 10-year period. Of the 3 patients younger than 18 years in the series, 1 had a lesion located in the forehead and those of the others were in the chest wall and left flank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NF in more usual locations is frequently incorrectly considered a malignant lesion due to its rapid growth, presence of a high cellularity, abundant mitotic figures, and capacity to be poorly circumscribed, and NF of the parotid gland is Other malignancies (dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, myxofibrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma) are rarely included in the histologic or cytologic differential diagnosis [11,16,18,22,23,27,28,30]. Needless to say, this is a broad reactive and neoplastic differential Fig.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] This deceptive histological appearance may result in erroneous diagnoses and inadequate treatment. [4][5][6] Since its initial description by Konwaler et al, 7 the neoplastic nature of NF has been debated. [8][9][10][11] Although a few studies showed evidence that at least a subset of NF were clonal in nature, others were unable to confirm these findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%