2020
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08902-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node-Positive Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Be Spared Axillary Lymph Node Dissection with Wireless Non-Radioactive Localizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data on this aspect lack detail in available studies but most authors report the placement of the marker into the "previously proven" node [44,48]. In contrast, marking of the suspicious lymph node immediately after the biopsy is reported by others [31,52]. Table 7 provides an overview of advantages and disadvantages of both strategies.…”
Section: When Should Lymph Nodes Be Marked?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on this aspect lack detail in available studies but most authors report the placement of the marker into the "previously proven" node [44,48]. In contrast, marking of the suspicious lymph node immediately after the biopsy is reported by others [31,52]. Table 7 provides an overview of advantages and disadvantages of both strategies.…”
Section: When Should Lymph Nodes Be Marked?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the tattooed node may not be identifiable intraoperatively due to migration or absorption of charcoal in some cases. Other localization techniques using Magseed or RFID Tags have successful removal rates of 94.6%-97% [19,20], but these are expensive techniques and not available worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) procedure involves removing SLNs with the clipped node by localization with iodine-125 radioactive seeds and had an FNR of 2.0% [10]. Other labeling and localization techniques such as wire localization of clipped nodes [11][12][13][14][15], tattooing [16][17][18], and clipped node localization using Magseed or Radiofrequency Identification Tags (RFID) [19,20] are under investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plecha et al [ 16 ] reported that the IR of wire-localized clipped nodes was 97% in 91 patients. If biopsy-proven positive nodes were marked before chemotherapy, IRs of more than 95% would have been reported [ 3 8 12 17 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%