2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node importance evaluation in aviation network based on “No Return” node deletion method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wen et al, 2018 [38] Proposed a node importance ranking based on so-called no-return nodes. Results on the Chinese airport network (199 nodes) and the US airport network (332 nodes and 2126 links) were reported.…”
Section: Clemente Et Al 2019 [37]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wen et al, 2018 [38] Proposed a node importance ranking based on so-called no-return nodes. Results on the Chinese airport network (199 nodes) and the US airport network (332 nodes and 2126 links) were reported.…”
Section: Clemente Et Al 2019 [37]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can find the key nodes with faster energy consumption and important position in the network, which is of great significance to enhance the invulnerability and prolong the life of the network. On the basis of a "no return" node deletion method, reference [20] uses the network efficiency, largest component size, and network flow as the indicators of network performance. Evaluating node importance is done by comparing the change of network overall performance before and after deleting nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a safe operation of the metro depends heavily on the orderly cooperation of multisystems and elements, metro-operation accidents tend to be increased by multiple interacted hazards occurred following certain sequences or in the form of a network. In recent years, the network node importance (NNI) evaluation has been viewed as an effective tool for prioritizing the nodes or factors of a networked system [3], which has been successfully used to investigate, e.g., traffic networks [4,5], power grids [6], and social networks [7,8]. However, the traditional NNI evaluation reliant on indicators of network topology (e.g., degree centrality and betweenness centrality) is capable of examining the physical or social networks for whom connectivity and accessibility are predominate attributes of the nodes, but are insufficient for explaining networks containing causal relations such as accident networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%