Node Centrality Comparison between Bus Line and Passenger Flow Networks in Beijing

Abstract

In recent decades, complex network theory has become one of the most important approaches for exploring the structure and dynamics of traffic networks. Most studies mainly focus on the static topology features of the traffic networks, and there are also increasing literature focusing on passenger flow networks. However, not much work has been completed on comparing the static networks with dynamic flow networks from the perspective of supply and demand. Therefore, this study aimed to apply the complex network approach to explore the spatial relationship between bus line organization and bus flows in Beijing. Based on the bus route data and the passenger flow data obtained from the Beijing smart bus card, this study investigated the spatial characteristics of the bus line network and the temporal bus flow networks, and presented a comparison analysis on the spatial relationship between them by using the node centrality indices, namely degree centrality, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality. The results show that the overall spatial patterns of node centralities between the bus line network and the bus flow network were similar, while there were also some differences. For weekdays, the correlation between them is higher, as calculated by the degree of centrality. For weekends, the two networks have a greater correlation measured by degree centrality and betweenness centrality. The highest coefficients of correlation between the line network and traffic network appear in the morning peak, which implies that the congestion issues during the morning peak hours might receive the highest priority in Beijing’s bus-line network planning. Our study can provide implications for policymakers to improve the public urban transport network, and thus enhance residents’ happiness.

Influence of Urban Railway Network Centrality on Residential Property Values in Bangkok

“…Tokyo discovered a strong relationship between railway network centrality and ridership [26]. In Beijing, bus networks exhibited a high correlation with passenger flow based on centrality measures [27]. Moreover, railway network centrality has been associated with subcenter formation in polycentric cities [28].…”

Exploring the Spatio-Temporally Heterogeneous Impact of Traffic Network Structure on Ride-Hailing Emissions Using Shenzhen, China, as a Case Study

“…Conversely, the negative impact range of betweenness centrality in bus network nodes is broader. This is because areas with higher betweenness centrality in bus network nodes often offer more convenient, economical, and environmentally friendly public transportation options [88]. This scenario can reduce the demand for ride-hailing services, subsequently decreasing emissions generated by ride-hailing travel.…”

How is Intraday Metro Ridership related to Station Centrality in Athens, Greece?

“…Network theory is valuable for analyzing public transport networks and a topic of growing attention. In this sense, centrality measures have been associated with ridership at stations of urban rail transit, with degree, betweenness and closeness as the most common ones (He, Zhao, and Tsui 2019;Dai et al 2022). For instance, passenger flows are related to centralities of both physical and service-level networks in tram systems (Luo, Cats, and van Lint 2020), while in metro systems, centralities of the physical network and the network of public transport alternatives demonstrate linear correlations with passenger flows at stations (Kopsidas, Douvaras, and Kepaptsoglou 2023a).…”