2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodal yield, morbidity, and recurrence after central neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
193
4
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
193
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, US had specificities >93% for detecting metastases in all subsites of the central neck, which may be used to preoperatively select a subpopulation of patients requiring central neck dissection, including those with macroscopic central nodal metastases. However, central neck dissection has been associated with potential surgical morbidity [18,19]. Because paratracheal metastases of unilateral PTC lesions on the contralateral side are uncommon [16,18,19], central neck dissection may spare the contralateral paratracheal area, thus minimizing surgical morbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, US had specificities >93% for detecting metastases in all subsites of the central neck, which may be used to preoperatively select a subpopulation of patients requiring central neck dissection, including those with macroscopic central nodal metastases. However, central neck dissection has been associated with potential surgical morbidity [18,19]. Because paratracheal metastases of unilateral PTC lesions on the contralateral side are uncommon [16,18,19], central neck dissection may spare the contralateral paratracheal area, thus minimizing surgical morbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, central neck dissection has been associated with potential surgical morbidity [18,19]. Because paratracheal metastases of unilateral PTC lesions on the contralateral side are uncommon [16,18,19], central neck dissection may spare the contralateral paratracheal area, thus minimizing surgical morbidities. However, patients with macroscpic nodal diseases on US may undergo bilateral central neck dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Central neck dissection (CND) may prevent central neck recurrence, but bilateral CND is associated with significant morbidity, especially postoperative hypoparathyroidism. [7][8][9] Despite being selflimiting in most patients, symptomatic hypocalcemia is of particular concern because of its delayed manifestation and the consequent need for prolonged patient hospitalization or readmission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the permanent hypoparathyroidism was documented in 6.5% for group A and 9.4% for group B patients which was much less than that reported by Tartaglia et al, 2014 25.4% of patients who underwent TT + CND, within the range reported by White et al, 20070-14.3% while Pereira et al, 2005Choi et al, 2011;Popadich et al,2011;Wang et al, 2013;and Lee et al, 2015 reported only 2%, 3% ,0.8%, 4.6% and 3.3% permanent hypoparathyroidism respectively. Temporary hypoparathyroidism was (Tartaglia et al, 2014), 6% (Wang et al, 2013) and 9.7% (Popadich et al, 2011) but sometimes as high as 60% (Pereira et al, 2005). In this study, the permanent VCD was documented in 3.2% in group A and 6.3% in group B which was within the reported range (0-12%) in other studies (Choi et al, 2011;Hughes and Doherty, 2011;Popadich et al, 2011;Giordano et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2013;Tartaglia et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015), while temporary VCD was reported to be 12.9% in group A and 9.4% in group B which was slightly higher than the reported range (0.4-9%) in other studies (Pereira et al, 2005;Popadich et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2013;Tartaglia et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporary hypoparathyroidism was (Tartaglia et al, 2014), 6% (Wang et al, 2013) and 9.7% (Popadich et al, 2011) but sometimes as high as 60% (Pereira et al, 2005). In this study, the permanent VCD was documented in 3.2% in group A and 6.3% in group B which was within the reported range (0-12%) in other studies (Choi et al, 2011;Hughes and Doherty, 2011;Popadich et al, 2011;Giordano et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2013;Tartaglia et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015), while temporary VCD was reported to be 12.9% in group A and 9.4% in group B which was slightly higher than the reported range (0.4-9%) in other studies (Pereira et al, 2005;Popadich et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2013;Tartaglia et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%