2018
DOI: 10.4171/rlm/831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodal solutions for nonlinear nonhomogeneous Robin problems

Abstract: We consider the nonlinear Robin problem driven by a nonhomogeneous differential operator plus an indefinite potential. The reaction term is a Carathéodory function satisfying certain conditions only near zero. Using suitable truncation, comparison, and cut-off techniques, we show that the problem has a sequence of nodal solutions converging to zero in the C 1 (Ω)-norm.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of Wang [20] was extended by Li-Wang [7] to semilinear Schrödinger equations. Extensions of these results were obtained by Papageorgiou-Vetro-Vetro [18] (semilinear Robin problems), Papageorgiou-Rǎdulescu-Repovš [15] (nonlinear Robin problems) and Papageorgiou-Rǎdulescu-Repovš [14] (Dirichlet (p, 2)-equations). In all the aforementioned works the source term is symmetric near zero and this leads to an application of a version of the symmetric mountain pass theorem, which generates the desired sequence of distinct nodal solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The work of Wang [20] was extended by Li-Wang [7] to semilinear Schrödinger equations. Extensions of these results were obtained by Papageorgiou-Vetro-Vetro [18] (semilinear Robin problems), Papageorgiou-Rǎdulescu-Repovš [15] (nonlinear Robin problems) and Papageorgiou-Rǎdulescu-Repovš [14] (Dirichlet (p, 2)-equations). In all the aforementioned works the source term is symmetric near zero and this leads to an application of a version of the symmetric mountain pass theorem, which generates the desired sequence of distinct nodal solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Also, we have * and so u λ * = 0, which contradicts our hypothesis that u λ * = 0. Therefore u λ * = 0 and by passing to the limit as n → +∞ in (15) and using (19), we infer that u λ * ∈ S + λ ⊆ D + and u λ * = inf S + λ .…”
Section: Solutions Of Constant Signmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…If in (15) we choose h = u n ∈ W 1,p (Ω) and we use ( 13), ( 16) and hypothesis H(f) (i) we infer that (17) {u n } n≥1 ⊆ W 1,p (Ω) is bounded.…”
Section: Solutions Of Constant Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation