1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodal CT density and total tumor volume as prognostic factors after radiation therapy of stage III/IV head and neck cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence has shown that Ki-67 may be a potential marker for radiosensitivity in head and neck carcinomas when using a cutoff point at o20 or X20% (Raybaud-Diogene et al, 1997;Grabenbauer et al, 1998;Couture et al, 2002). Koelbl et al (2001), however, did not find a correlation between Ki-67 expression and radiation response, but an improved local control in tumours with complete response after radiotherapy (40 Gy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence has shown that Ki-67 may be a potential marker for radiosensitivity in head and neck carcinomas when using a cutoff point at o20 or X20% (Raybaud-Diogene et al, 1997;Grabenbauer et al, 1998;Couture et al, 2002). Koelbl et al (2001), however, did not find a correlation between Ki-67 expression and radiation response, but an improved local control in tumours with complete response after radiotherapy (40 Gy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies have provided evidence that with a higher proliferative activity, head and neck cancers may respond significantly better to radiotherapy (Raybaud-Diogene et al, 1997;Grabenbauer et al, 1998;Kropveld et al, 1998;Couture et al, 2002). Evidence has shown that Ki-67 may be a potential marker for radiosensitivity in head and neck carcinomas when using a cutoff point at o20 or X20% (Raybaud-Diogene et al, 1997;Grabenbauer et al, 1998;Couture et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, MNV and primary tumor volume were reported to play important roles in predicting prognosis [8,9,20,21]. In an analysis of 79 HNSCC patients who underwent primary irradiation or chemoradiation, MNV was the most important prognostic factor for the control of pathological nodes in the neck [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of tumor volume using pretreatment computed tomography (CT) images has been proposed as a method for predicting prognosis in different malignancies [5,6]. As lymph node metastasis status has a great impact on the prognosis of HNSCC patients [7], recent studies have suggested regional lymph node volume, and not only the primary tumor volume, as a predictor of treatment outcome [8,9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies with long term tumour control and survival as end points have identified such cut-off values for PTV ranging from 19.6 cm 3 to 35 cm 3 and for TTV, from 22.8 cm 3 to 110 cm 3 depending upon the places where these were conducted. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] In our study, for early response evaluation at 3 months of CCRT "optimal threshold cut-off" for PTV and TTV were higher (41 cm 3 and 42 cm 3 , respectively), primarily owing to a large tumour burden in our country. This method may categorise patients into either a favourable group (TV less than cut-off) or unfavourable group (TV more than cut-off) at a pre-treatment stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%