2018
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2018v43.n10.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Nobody is Watching but Everything I do is Measured': Teacher Accountability, Learner Agency and the Crisis of Control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As another example, Cindy would question and challenge Tanya in the interest of having a functional prototype of her own design. It is likely that such agentic actions and behaviors of Walt and Cindy would not be enacted, nor taken up or accepted, in some learning environments in which there is an emphasis placed on knowledge, high‐stakes testing, and teacher accountability (Dargusch & Charteris, 2018; Manyukhina & Wyse, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As another example, Cindy would question and challenge Tanya in the interest of having a functional prototype of her own design. It is likely that such agentic actions and behaviors of Walt and Cindy would not be enacted, nor taken up or accepted, in some learning environments in which there is an emphasis placed on knowledge, high‐stakes testing, and teacher accountability (Dargusch & Charteris, 2018; Manyukhina & Wyse, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Arnesen's et al (2020) case study of student off-task behaviour in a NTLS, students who were highly ambitious, motivated and high achieving were found to engage in significant off-task practices. Nobody is watching but everything I do is measured is the provocative title adopted by Dargusch and Charteris (2018), who suggest that assessment creates accountability pressure and is effectively a form of silent governance. While they were referring to teacher autonomy, it could be suggested that the same holds for students, thus acting to limit the development of student agency.…”
Section: Moving Beyond the Mundane: A Complex Appreciation Of Student Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because it is output alone that is being recognised, examined and measured. If, for teachers, the 'only thing that counts is what can be counted', then the scope for genuine power-sharing with students is severely limited (Dargusch & Charteris, 2018), further exacerbated by the borderlessness of NTLS, becoming another 'problem' for teachers to manage. Arguably then, any suggestion of 'authentic agency' is a fiction.…”
Section: Moving Beyond the Mundane: A Complex Appreciation Of Student Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sahlberg (2016) notes the variety in policy enactment in countries like the UK, USA, Australia and Canada. The 'relational and locally negotiated' nature of policy implementation and experience (Savage and O'Connor 2015, 610) is revealed in research which offers insights into the particular manifestation of the principles of marketisation, competition and accountability, in, for example, the USA, Australia and Sweden (Brathwaite 2017;Dargusch and Charteris 2018;Dahlstedt and Fejes 2019). Commonplace is the impact of reform on teachers (Ball 2003;Sahlberg 2016;Aderet-German, Segal, and Vedder-Weiss 2019), and significant for professional identity (Hall and McGinity 2015), pedagogy and practice (Bradbury 2018) and school leadership (Keddie 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%