2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No X-rays from WASP-18

Abstract: About 20% of the >1000 known exoplanets are Jupiter analogs orbiting very close to their parent stars. It is still under debate to what detectable level such hot Jupiters possibly affect the activity of the host stars through tidal or magnetic star-planet interaction. In this paper we report on an 87 ks Chandra observation of the hot Jupiter hosting star WASP-18. This system is composed of an F6 type star and a hot Jupiter of mass 10.4 M Jup orbiting in less than 20 hr around the parent star. On the basis of a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong tides generated on the star by such a massive and close-in planet might significantly affect the stellar dynamo and remarkably reduce its activity. On the other hand, evidence for hot Jupiters spinning up their hosts was found by Poppenhaeger & Wolk (2014) in CoRoT-2 and possibly HD 189733.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong tides generated on the star by such a massive and close-in planet might significantly affect the stellar dynamo and remarkably reduce its activity. On the other hand, evidence for hot Jupiters spinning up their hosts was found by Poppenhaeger & Wolk (2014) in CoRoT-2 and possibly HD 189733.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 Cnc b and GJ 436 b have proven to be suitable targets for Lyα transit observations, thus, we included them in our analysis. The sample was scanned for previous X-ray observations: WASP-18 was not detected in a dedicated X-ray observation (Pillitteri et al 2014) and WASP-43 has been analyzed by Czesla et al (2013). The remaining seven host stars did not have any prior X-ray observation and unrestrictive ROSAT upper limits.…”
Section: Target Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that selection biases (acting primarily at low M P /a 2 ) and cumulative tidal influences (relevant primarily at high M P /a 2 ) combine to mimic the statistical signature of star-planet interaction. Of course, these effects do not rule out magnetic recombination events producing enhanced activity, 22 but they 21 WASP-18 experiences significant tidal effects from the planet (Arras et al 2012) and may also be spun-up, although it is still inactive (see Miller et al 2012, Pillitteri et al 2014b, and references therein).…”
Section: Cumulative Tidal Effects In Extreme Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in the best candidate systems, any signatures seem to be transient (Shkolnik et al 2008). As a striking counterexample, the extreme WASP-18 system, which contains a ≃ 10M Jup planet in a 0.94 d period, shows no evidence for planet-linked activity (Miller et al 2012;Pillitteri et al 2014b); such interaction must be either absent, only rarely present, or 8 We ignore the distinction between M P and the minimum mass of explanets derived from radial velocity work, since the sin i inclination term is unknown for most of these systems but provides a typical correction of only ∼15% (Wright & Gaudi 2013). rendered inefficient by an extremely weak stellar magnetic field 9 Shkolnik et al 2013; but see also Miller et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%