No way out? Opportunities for mediation efforts in the Donbas region

Landwehr, Jakob

doi:10.1080/21599165.2019.1647532

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Like the Minsk Treaty I, the Minsk II Agreement was also signed by the Swiss Ambassador to the OSCE Heidi Tavliagini, Second President of Ukraine Leonid Kuchma, and Ambassador of the Russian Federation Mikhail Zurabov. This agreement was also signed by Representatives of the DPR and LPR, namely Vladimir Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitski (Landwehr, 2019). The main change in the Minsk II Treaty was a ceasefire, significantly reducing casualties.…”

Section: Minsk Agreement IImentioning

confidence: 95%

A Critical Discourse Analysis Russophobia Rhetoric in UN Security Council's Speech by Antony J. Blinken

Ma'arif

Maksum

2022

intermestic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to explore Antony John Blinken's anti-Russian discourse that appeared in a speech at the 2022 UN Security Council after Russia invaded Ukraine. The discourse presented by Blinken implies various anti-Russian languages, especially in terms of security, namely the military. This study uses an ideological quadratic model under the umbrella of critical discourse studies using securitization theory combined with the concept of propaganda. Data collection, validation, and linguistic investigation are using the NVivo 12 Plus application and VOS Viewer. The data sources are literature studies through ebooks, news, and journals from Scopus and Google Scholar. The findings found that Blinken's propaganda scheme in his speech tried to portray Russia in negative terms. It is evident that many statements issued by Blinken discredit Russia and seem to regard Russia as a common enemy, with the invasion of Ukraine as a common latent danger.

show abstract

Section: Minsk Agreement IImentioning

confidence: 95%