2018
DOI: 10.21037/acs.2018.05.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-touch vein grafts and the destiny of venous revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting—a 25th anniversary perspective

Abstract: Ischemic heart disease is currently the leading cause of death globally, with coronary artery bypass grafting among the most common operations performed worldwide. More extensive use of arterial grafts has been advocated because of their high long-term patency, long-term survival benefit, and freedom from reinterventions. Despite this, the saphenous vein is the most frequently used conduit in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery since its introduction over 50 years ago. Consequently, the saphenou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No Touch SVG harvesting has been shown to have favorable biochemical and histological findings in vein specimens [58] – furthermore, the fatty pedicle may provide some external support, and also reduces the risk of kinking of the SVG in the pericardium [7, 22]. Using an artificial external support device such as a Venous External Stent (VEST) has also shown to reduce diffuse intimal hyperplasia 1 year after CABG [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No Touch SVG harvesting has been shown to have favorable biochemical and histological findings in vein specimens [58] – furthermore, the fatty pedicle may provide some external support, and also reduces the risk of kinking of the SVG in the pericardium [7, 22]. Using an artificial external support device such as a Venous External Stent (VEST) has also shown to reduce diffuse intimal hyperplasia 1 year after CABG [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No results have yet been reported regarding PCI of a saphenous vein harvested with the no-touch technique or treated in any other way during the primary CAGB operation. The no-touch technique differs from the conventional technique in that it causes less endothelium damage during the harvesting procedure [42,43] and leads to reduced neo-intimal hyperplasia and subsequent atherosclerosis in the long term [44].Our future intention is to evaluate whether PCI of a no-touch SVG results in better outcome compared to PCI in conventional SVGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a standard therapy for ischemic heart disease. Despite the inferior patency compared to arterial grafts, saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are still widely transplanted for CABG due to their ease of manipulation [ 1 4 ]. Consequently, the long-term patency of SVG has been thoroughly investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%