1945
DOI: 10.1590/s0006-87051945001200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[No Title Available]

Abstract: Inflorescência de Cyperus rotundas L. (tiririca)Apenas micélio vegetativo abundante. Picnídios ausentes. Pecíolo de mandioca Manihot utilissima PohlMicélio mais ou menos cinéreo. Picnídios abundantes. Folhas de Palma;Micélio vegetativo abundante. Picnídios ausentes. Galhos de planta indeterminada Picnídios abundantes. Micélio pouco desenvolvido.Penas de galinha Nenhum desenvolvimento. Inflorescências de

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1950
1950
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the species of Ascochyta recorded on Phaseolus, this fungus agrees most closely with published descriptions of A. phaseolorum, and therefore these collections are referred to this species. Spore length is less than that reported by Sutton and Waterston (1966), but is in agreement with dimensions given by Saccardo (1884), Grove (1935), Sneep (1945), andCrossan (1954 Because of the close agreement between these specimens and the description of A. oro (Viegas 1945), the type collection for this species was examined (IACM 436). The fungus present on the specimen is indistinguishable from A. phaseolorum, and in addition an isolate obtained locally from the type host was pathogenic to bean (Table 1).…”
Section: (B) Identity Of the Causal Fungussupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Of the species of Ascochyta recorded on Phaseolus, this fungus agrees most closely with published descriptions of A. phaseolorum, and therefore these collections are referred to this species. Spore length is less than that reported by Sutton and Waterston (1966), but is in agreement with dimensions given by Saccardo (1884), Grove (1935), Sneep (1945), andCrossan (1954 Because of the close agreement between these specimens and the description of A. oro (Viegas 1945), the type collection for this species was examined (IACM 436). The fungus present on the specimen is indistinguishable from A. phaseolorum, and in addition an isolate obtained locally from the type host was pathogenic to bean (Table 1).…”
Section: (B) Identity Of the Causal Fungussupporting
confidence: 85%