2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NO TIME FOR DEAD TIME: TIMING ANALYSIS OF BRIGHT BLACK HOLE BINARIES WITHNuSTAR

Abstract: Timing of high-count rate sources with the NuSTAR Small Explorer Mission requires specialized analysis techniques. NuSTAR was primarily designed for spectroscopic observations of sources with relatively low count-rates rather than for timing analysis of bright objects. The instrumental dead time per event is relatively long (∼2.5 msec), and varies by a few percent event-to-event. The most obvious effect is a distortion of the white noise level in the power density spectrum (PDS) that cannot be modeled easily w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
92
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Timing analysis of NuSTAR observations I-IV is presented by Bachetti et al (2015). The power spectral density (PSD) between 0.001-200 Hz is consistent with typical hard-state PSDs and is described well by three Lorentzian components (see, e.g., Belloni et al 2005).…”
Section: Nustarmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Timing analysis of NuSTAR observations I-IV is presented by Bachetti et al (2015). The power spectral density (PSD) between 0.001-200 Hz is consistent with typical hard-state PSDs and is described well by three Lorentzian components (see, e.g., Belloni et al 2005).…”
Section: Nustarmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For the NuSTAR observation, we used the technique described by Bachetti et al (2015) to calculate the cospectrum, a proxy of the power density spectrum, to account for the wellknown effects of the NuSTAR instrumental dead time. We obtained light curves with a bin time of 0.025 s separately for the focal plane modules A and B, calculated the Fourier transform on each detector, produced the cross-power density spectrum and took the real part of it, normalized following Belloni & Hasinger (1990a).…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the frequencies involved are well below 100 Hz, we then corrected the measured rms by dividing it by the ratio between incident and detected photons as described in Bachetti et al (2015).…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the NuSTAR data, these are actually cospectra between the two focal plane modules or FPMs. The cospectrum is the real component of the cross spectrum between the two X--ray detectors 13 , employed as a means to cancel dead time distortions to the PSDs. Both the optical and X--ray PSDs were computed using light curve segments of duration 512 s, and we restrict analysis for both energies to the Nyquist frequency of the optical of ≈13.5 Hz after mild frequency binning.…”
Section: Power Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further details on the procedure, see ref. 13 for details on NuSTAR PSD extraction, and ref. 5 for details on the optical PSDs of V404 Cygni.…”
Section: Power Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%