2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2019.125624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No systematic effects of sampling direction on climate-growth relationships in a large-scale, multi-species tree-ring data set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To detect the climatic signal retained in these annual rings, the time series obtained can be selectively improved before being correlated with the climatic variables, through some statistical methods (Peters et al, 2015). This normalisation process is performed in order to remove variance not related to the climate, associated with factors such as the size or age of the tree or the difference between trees of the same population, homogenising the different growth rates (Gut et al, 2019; Peters et al, 2015). This type of improvement converts ring width/area measurements into relative indices that form standardised chronologies that represent growth variability for a given species and geographic area (Carrer, 2011; Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect the climatic signal retained in these annual rings, the time series obtained can be selectively improved before being correlated with the climatic variables, through some statistical methods (Peters et al, 2015). This normalisation process is performed in order to remove variance not related to the climate, associated with factors such as the size or age of the tree or the difference between trees of the same population, homogenising the different growth rates (Gut et al, 2019; Peters et al, 2015). This type of improvement converts ring width/area measurements into relative indices that form standardised chronologies that represent growth variability for a given species and geographic area (Carrer, 2011; Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One core per tree was extracted at breast height (1.3 m) using a Pressler borer (Haglof Company Group, Sweden) with a 5-mm inner diameter. To avoid the compression of the wood, the cores were sampled in the direction parallel to the slope [35]. After careful surface preparation to maximize the visibility of the tree rings, all core samples were measured using a VIAS TimeTable measuring system (SCIEM, Vienna, Austria) with a measuring length of 78 cm and a resolution of 1/100 mm).…”
Section: Tree Core Sampling Tree-ring Width and Stable Isotope Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarris et al 2007, Mazza and Manetti 2013, Bond-Lamberty et al 2014, Peltier et al 2018. The explanatory power of these approaches, however, still tends to be relatively poor, particularly considering the huge amount of tree-ring data available across species, elevations and continents (Zhao et al 2018), and the over-representation of trees that are highly sensitive to climate in available data sets (Nehrbass-Ahles et al 2014;Klesse et al 2018;Gut et al 2019). Any aspiring dendrochronologist may be surprised to find it can be challenging to detect strong correlations among tree-ring widths and any single climatic variable, and a number of methods have been developed for discovering these correlations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2018; Gut et al . 2019). Any aspiring dendrochronologist may be surprised to find it can be challenging to detect strong correlations among tree‐ring widths and any single climatic variable, and a number of methods have been developed for discovering these correlations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%